This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Commission to foreign parties-Short deduction of tax at source-No disallowance can be made-Model OECD Convention-Art. 7. [S. 9(1)(i)]

DCIT v. DML Exim (P.) Ltd. (2020) 184 ITD 432 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Amendment made by Finance Act (No. 2) to section 40(a)(ia) with effect from 01-04-2015, is curative in nature and thus said provision has to be applied retrospectively.

Muradul Haque v. ITO (2020) 184 ITD 58 / 84 ITR 396 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Technical know-how-For upgrading engines of vehicles so as to make emission normal and also to make vehicles eco-friendly-Capital in nature-Entitle depreciation. [S. 32]

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 621 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenditure towards joint venture-Held to be capital in nature-Travel expenses-mergers and acquisitions of entities engaged in similar business-Held to be capital in nature-Consultancy fees-For developing new range of tractors and also upgradation of existing range of tractors, said expenditure was to be treated as capital in nature-Staff cost revenue nature.

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 621 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for wages-Pending labour demand regarding incremental wages-Held to be allowable Capital or revenue-Premium on redemption of foreign currency convertible Bonds-Prorate premium payable on redemption of foreign currency convertible Bonds-Allowable as deduction-Issue of foreign currency convertible bonds-Held to be allowable as revenue expenditure-Discount given on issue of employee stock ownership plan-Allowable as business expenditure. Employee’ welfare expenses-Amount paid to an educational institution where children of assessee’s employees were taking education-Held to be allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision made towards warranty-Held to be allowable-Discount on issue of employee stock ownership plan held to be allowable-Professional fee towards acquisition-Entities which did not materialize was to be allowed as revenue expenditure-Abandoned project-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 621 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Education expenditure-Personal expenditure-Disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 132]

Harshvardhan Johari v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 537 / (2021) 199 DTR 41/210 TTJ 383 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Pharmaceutical company-Freebies to doctors-Gifts as product reminders, travel facilities of doctors, conference of doctors or similar freebies to medical practitioners or their professional associations would not be hit by Explanation 1 to section 37(1).

Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 8 /207 TTJ 143 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Repairs of machinery and replacement of some of its parts-Allowable as business expenditure. [S. 32]

DCIT v. Gulshan Chemicals Ltd. (2020) 184 ITD 71 / 208 TTJ 153 / (2021) 197 DTR 274 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Amount written off in the books of account-Allowable as deduction. [S. 36(2)]

Firemenich Aromatics (I) (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 43 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Borrowed funds used for giving interest free loan to sister concerns-Interest disallowable., interest on funds diverted for non-business purpose was to be disallowed.

Global Tech Park (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 673 (Bang.) (Trib.)