This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 272A : Penalty-Default in delivering statement of tax deducted at source-Affidavit stating it had not paid any amount or deducted any tax at source during years in question-Penalty is not leviable. [S. 200(3), 272A(2)(K), Form 26Q, 27EQ]

District Mining Officer v. JCIT(TDS) (2020) 84 ITR 54 (SN) (All.) (Trib.)

S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Addition deleted-Penalty does not survive.

Roop Kishore Madan v. Dy.CIT (2020) 84 ITR 36 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271AA : Penalty-Failure to keep and maintain books of accounts-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Information regarding international Transactions maintained properly in Transfer Pricing Report-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 92, 92C, 92D, 92E, R. 10D, Form 3CEB]

ACIT v. Micromax Informatics Ltd. (2020)84 ITR 19 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bona fide and inadvertent reporting of lower Book profits in return-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 115JB]

Vanshee Builders and Developers P. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 84 ITR 1 (SN) / (2021) 187 ITD 361 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Capital gains-Transfer of book adjustment-Income resulting to loss-Inadvertent mistake-Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 45]

Advent Computer Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 84 ITR 29 (SN) (Chen.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Depreciation on digital set top box and control room equipment at sixty per cent-Restricted to fifteen per cent-Levy of penalty is not valid.

Abs Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 84 ITR 20 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue Capital gains-Substantial investment in new property within prescribed period-Receipt of occupancy certificate after period of two years irrelevant-Exemption allowed is held to be valid-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 54]

Jyotsna Sunderlal Shroff v. PCIT (2020)84 ITR 38 (SN) (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Duties-Non-speaking and cryptic order-Directed to pass reasoned and speaking order. [S. 254(1)]

Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT (LTU) (2020)84 ITR 2 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds Refund-No delay attributable to assessee-Interest on self-assessment tax-paid-Allowable from date of payment of self-assessment tax till date of grant of refund. [S. 244(1)(a)]

Grasim Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 84 ITR 15 (SN.) / (2021) 186 ITD 675 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 234E : Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Deduction of tax at source-Delay in filing return-Amendment is prospective. [S. 200A(1)(c)]

Elchico Hotels and Restaurants P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(CPC)(TDS) (2020) 84 ITR 52 (SN) (All.)(Trib.)