This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-Principal officer-Director for short period-Assessee cannot be held to be Principal Officer-Notice was set aside. [S. 2(35), Art. 226]

Suvendra Kumar Panda v. ITO (2021) 276 Taxman 171 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment- After the expiry of four years-Deduction at source-Rent-Audit objection-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 40(a)(ia) , 148 , 194I]

PCIT v. Bharathi Constructions (2021) 276 Taxman 244 (Mad.)(HC)

S.143(3) : Assessment -Unexplained money-Initiation of penalty proceedings-Cryptic order-Non issue of notice-Violation of principle of natural justice-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 69C, 142(1), 271AAC, Art. 226]

Sapta Panchait Kirshk Seva Swablambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. UOI (2021) 276 Taxman 7 /199 DTR 148 / 320 CTR 356(Patna)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Mismatched PAN-Demonetised notes- Assessment order was passed without considering material produced by assesse-Court directed to redo the assessment after considering the materials on record. [Art. 226]

IY TEE CEE Trading Company v. ACIT (2021) 276 Taxman 116/199 DTR 110/ 319 CTR 710 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Search and Seizure-Show cause notice had clearly spelt out reasons for proposed transfer of case of assesse-Dismissal of petition by High Court is affirmed. [S. 132 Art. 226]

V.V. Minerals v. PCIT (2021) 276 Taxman 279 (SC) Editorial: Affirmed the Judgment in V.V. Minerals v. PCIT (Mad.)(HC) (WAMD No. 417/2020 dt 30 -6 -2020)

S. 115A : Foreign companies-Tax-Dividends-Royalty-Technical services fees-Rates prevailing during different periods under DTAA and under section 115A which were more beneficial to assessee, had to be applied-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 90(2), Art. 12]

DIT (IT) v. IBM World Trade Corporation (2021) 436 ITR 641 / 276 Taxman 211 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-TPO passing the order without following the Direction of the Appellate Tribunal-Alternative remedy is available-Writ is not maintainable-Order of single judge rejecting the Writ petition is affirmed. [S. 92CA, 143, 144C, 148, Art. 226]

Hyundai Motor India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ( 2021) 432 ITR 306/ 276 Taxman 156 / 199 DTR 124 /320 CTR 106 ( Mad) (HC)

S. 80IC : Special category states-Consumption of electricity-Mismatch of production-Denial of exemption is held to be not justifies.

CIT v. Borkar Packaging (P.) Ltd. (2021) 276 Taxman 131 / 199 DTR 526/ 320 CTR 792(Bom.)(HC)

S. 80IB : Industrial undertakings-Failure to provide details of number of workmen working in each units in form No. 10CCB-Denial of exemption is held to be not valid. [Form no. 10CCB]

CIT v. Borkar Packaging (P.) Ltd. (2021) 276 Taxman 131 / 199 DTR 526/ 320 CTR 792 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 70 : Set off loss-One source against income from another source- Same head of income-Could be set off against income of assessee under same head from other unit not eligible for deduction under said section- Matter remanded to the Tribunal. [S. 10B, 71, 80B(5), 80IC]

TVS Motor Company Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 276 Taxman 25 (Mad.)(HC)