S. 68 : Cash credits-Failure to give an opportunity of cross examination-Tribunal remanding the matter to CIT (A)-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 254 (1)]
Ponmani Suresh v. Dy. CIT (2020) 275 Taxman 20 (Mad.)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits-Failure to give an opportunity of cross examination-Tribunal remanding the matter to CIT (A)-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 254 (1)]
Ponmani Suresh v. Dy. CIT (2020) 275 Taxman 20 (Mad.)(HC)S. 48 : Capital gains-Cost of acquisition-Encumbrance-Property received under settlement deed-Land mortgaged to bank-Proportionate OTS amount paid to clear encumbrances allowable as deduction. [S. 45, 49, 55]
N. Rajarajan v. ACIT (2020) 275 Taxman 196 (Mad.)(HC)S. 45 : Capital gains-Investment in shares-High turnover of shares-Assessable as capital gains and not as business income. [S. 28(i)]
PCIT v. Gujrat Fluorochemicals Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 366 (Guj) (HC)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Foreign exchange derivative loss cannot be disallowed holding it to be a speculative loss-Remand to the Assessing Officer is held to be valid. [S. 43(5)]
PCIT v. Precot Meridian Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 398 (Mad.)(HC)S. 28(i) : Business loss-Investment in subsidiary-Wound up of subsidiary-Loss is allowable. [S. 37(1)]
ACE Designers (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 275 Taxman 138( 2021 )198 DTR 118 (Karn.)(HC)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Interest free funds more than investment-No disallowance can be made. [R. 8D]
PCIT v. Gujrat Fluorochemicals Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 366 (Guj.)(HC)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Failure to prove that no expenditure was incurred-Disallowance of expenditure is held to be justified. [R. 8D]
Polaris Consulting and Services Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 275 Taxman 121 (Mad.)(HC)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Recording of satisfaction is mandatory-Disallowance cannot exceed exempt income. [R. 8D]
Marg Ltd. v. CIT (2020) 275 Taxman 502 (Mad.)(HC)S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Salary paid to secretary-50% of salary was allowed as reasonable-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]
Avani Village Welfare Society v. ITO (2020) 275 Taxman 618 (Mad.)(HC)S. 10AA : Special economic zones-Export turnover-Expenditure incurred in foreign exchange is to be excluded from ‘Export Turnover’ for purpose of computing deduction.
Polaris Consulting and Services Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 275 Taxman 121 (Mad.)(HC)