S. 92B : Transfer pricing-International transaction-Corporate guarantee is not international transaction prior to amendment of section 92B w.e.f. 1-4-2012.
Vivimed Labs Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 187 ITD 665 (Hyd.)(Trib.)S. 92B : Transfer pricing-International transaction-Corporate guarantee is not international transaction prior to amendment of section 92B w.e.f. 1-4-2012.
Vivimed Labs Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 187 ITD 665 (Hyd.)(Trib.)S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Credit facilities to members-Deposit from members-Penalty proceedings wrongly mentioning as Co-Operative bank-Deduction cannot be denied. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i), 271D]
Thane Zilla Madhyamik Shikshak Sangh Sahakari Parpedhi Maryadit v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 201 / 197 DTR 81 / 209 TTJ 571 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 80IE : Undertakings-North-Eastern states-Ineligible units-Disallowance cannot be made by applying provisions of section 80IA(10) of the Act. [S. 80IA(10)]
DCIT v. Century Plyboards (I) Ltd. (2021) 187 ITD 35 (SN)) 209 TTJ 273/ 203 DTR 229 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 80IC : Special category States-Initial assessment year-Substantial expansion within a period of 10 years-Substantial expansion was undertaken would become initial assessment year-Entitled to 100 per cent deduction for a total period of ten years as provided in section 80IC(6) of the Act. [S. 80IC(6)]
Quantum Power Systems v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 523 / 86 ITR 9 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 80IAB : Undertaking-Development of Special Economic Zone-Lease rental-business’ of developing-Eligible for deduction.
DCIT v. DLF Assets (P.) Ltd. (2021) 187 ITD 857 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-solid waste management-Agreement with Municipal corporation-Substantial work by assessee-Entitle deduction.
Antony Waste Handling Cell (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 1 / 209 TTJ 15 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Deduction disallowed for interest on delayed payments-bore no nexus to the industrial activity of power generation-disallowed.
NLC India v. DCIT (2021) 87 ITR 121 (Chennai)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-NRI purchasing property in India-Gave satisfactory explanation of source of fund-Even if explanation was not satisfactory no addition can be made.
Iqbal Ismail Virani v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 654 / 211 TTJ 913 / 204 DTR 354 (Panaji)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Cash deposited in bank account-Remand report-Once the AO has examined the document so produced by the assessee and recorded his satisfaction regarding the identity of the donors, genuineness of the gifts and sources of such gifts, the assessee has discharged the necessary onus cast on her and the addition directed to be deleted.
Shweta Goyal (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 57 (SN) (Jaipur)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Information coming to assessing officer of bank accounts in switzerland relating to assessee-Interest on balance in accounts computed and treated as undisclosed income-Tribunal for earlier year holding assessee not owner of amount in accounts and interest cannot be added in assessee’s hands.
Dy. CIT v. Anurag Dalmia (2021) 87 ITR 51 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)