S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Provision for automatic vacation of stay on completion of 365 days, whether or not assessee responsible for delay in hearing appeal-Discriminatory and arbitrary-Proviso to be read to provide for vacation of stay on expiry of periods in question only where delay attributable to assessee-The expression “permissible” policy of taxation would refer to a policy that is constitutionally permissible. If the policy is itself arbitrary and discriminatory, such policy will have to be struck down. [Art. 14, 226]
Dy.CIT v. Pepsi Foods Ltd. (2021) 433 ITR 295 / 200 DTR 185 / 320 CTR 1 (SC) Editorial : Decisions in Pepsi Foods Ltd v. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Delhi) (HC) and ITO v. Ail Girishbhai Darji (2017) 10 ITR-OL 434 (Guj) (HC) affirmed. Dy. CIT (TDS) v. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd (2015) 376 ITR 23 (Guj) (HC) impliedly approved, CIT v. Maruti Suzuki (India) Ltd (2014) 362 ITR 215 (Delhi) (HC) impliedly disapproved.