This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account without providing an opportunity is held to be not valid-Cash credits-Rejection of documents without any reason is held to be not justified-Matter remanded. [S. 68]
Ramanlal K. Darji v. ITO (2020) 184 ITD 408 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Succession to business otherwise than on death-Amalgamating company was not in existence at time of conduct of assessment proceedings as well as on date of passing Assessment Order-Assessment Order passed in name of amalgamating company being void ab initio was to be set aside. [S. 170, 292B]
Genpact India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Computation for purpose of clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without restoring to computation as contemplated under section 14A, read with rule 8D. [S. 14A, R. 8D]
Zaveri & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 777 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Additional revenue on account of subsequent realization of export-Addition cannot be made while computing book profit. [S. 10A]
Dy.CIT v. Yahoo Software Development (P.) Ltd. (2020) 80 ITR 528 / 184 ITD 305/ 196 DTR 241/208 TTJ 1072 (Bang.) (Trib.)
S. 92CA : Reference to transfer pricing officer-There was no transfer pricing adjustment of more than 10 crores in earlier year-Assessing Officers reference to TPO was in contravention to Instruction No. 3 of 2016 and such reference was to be declared as invalid. [S. 92C]
Sava Healthcare Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 312 / 189 DTR 1 / 78 ITR 65 (SN) / 204 TTJ 513 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-company engaged in the business of investment banking, merchant banking, merger and acquisition, private equity, syndication, etc. cannot be compared to non-binding investment advisory service provider.
Khazanah India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 184 ITD 890 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-A company engaged in distribution of software product could be accepted as valid comparable.
Sony Pictures Networks India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 794 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-TNMM method-constantly accepted to be Most Appropriate Method-TNMM would be appropriate methodology-Corporate guarantee-Spread rate would be applied to gross amount of guarantee, and not on actual loan availed by AE.
Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 714 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Volume difference in transaction values, funding issues, environmental issues, geographical location of clients and alleged differences in FAR without specifying same were held not grounds to reject CPM method and adopt TNMM method in oil and gas sector-Appellate Tribunal-Period of 90 days for pronouncement of orders after date of hearing is to be computed by excluding period during which nationwide COVID 19 pandemic lockdown was in force. [S. 255, ITAT R. 34]
Mott MacDonald (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2020) 184 ITD 656 / 190 DTR 21 / 206 TTJ 30 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable- Development of software products, was to be excluded from list of comparables-Bigger sized company having large turnover was to be excluded from the list of comaparbles.
Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 393 (Pune)(Trib.)