This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 57 : Income from other sources-Deductions-Fixed deposits- Interest payment for earning income is held to be deductible. [S. 56, 57(iii)]
Best Trading and Agencies Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 428 ITR 52 / 275 Taxman 550/ ( 2021 ) 203 DTR 269/ 321 CTR 373 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Purchase or construction need not be made out of sale consideration for capital asset. [S. 45]
Moturi Lakshmi (Ms.) v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 462 / 274 Taxman 286 / 194 DTR 417 (2021) 318 CTR 462 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 45 : Capital gains-Unabsorbed depreciation-Set off against long-term capital gains is permissible-Block of assets-Sale of land and building-Land and building valued separately-Held to be proper. [S. 2(11), 32(2), 71, 72, 73]
PCIT v. Gunnebo India Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 233 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-Hedge against loss-Exporter of cotton entering into forward contracts-Loss Incurred-Not a loss in speculative transaction -Entitled to deduction of loss. [S. 28(i)]
CIT v. Celebrity Fashion Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 470 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Banking facilities available-No evidence of compelling circumstances justifying payments-Disallowance is justified. [R. 6DD]
Vaduganathan Talkies v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 224 / 275 Taxman 599 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-No reasonable cause to make payment- Disallowance is held to be justified. [R. 6DD]
Nam Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 186/(2021) 277 Taxman 169 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Service charges paid to employees in terms of agreement entered into under Industrial Disputes Act-Allowable as deduction. [Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, S.18(1)]
New Woodlands Hotel Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 428 ITR 492 / 274 Taxman 468 / 196 DTR 449 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Loan to purchase plant and machinery-Increase in liability due to fluctuation in foreign exchange rates-Capital expenditure.
Continuum Wind Energe (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 559 (2021) 277 Taxman 30 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bank-Purchase and sale of securities -Broken period interest paid on purchase of securities allowable as deduction when the broken period interest from sale offered to tax as business income. [S. 28(i), 145]
CIT(LTU) v. State Bank of India (SBI) (2020) 428 ITR 316/194 DTR 259 / (2021 ) 277 Taxman (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed against the High Court order . CIT(LTU) v. State Bank of India ( 2021 ) 281 Taxman 368 (SC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed Depreciation-Carry Forward And Set Off-Finance Act Of 2001 and Circular No. 14 of 2001-No time limit for carry forward and set off. [S. 32(2)]
CIT v. Sanmar Speciality Chemicals Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 237/ ( 2021) 278 Taxman 194 (Mad.)(HC)