This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 268A : Appeal-Monitory tax effect less than of Rs. 1 crore-Appeal dismissed. [S. 260A]

CIT v. Shriram Properties (P) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 313 (Mad.)(HC) PCIT v. Mangal Tirth Estates Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 80 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Capital gains-Sale of agricultural land-Order set aside-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer [S. 45, 54B, Art. 226]

S. Sundaramurthy v. PCIT (2020) 269 Taxman 107 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Remand-Fresh claim Wholesale remand for framing a fresh assessment,-Assessing Officer could not deny to evaluate fresh claim raised by assessee during remand assessment proceedings. [S. 144]

Curewel (India) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 269 Taxman 397 / 185 DTR 145 / 312 CTR 164 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Payment to cable operators for channel fee-Liable to deduct tax at source under section 194C and not under section 194C of the Act. [S. 194J]

PCIT v. Star Entertainment Media (P) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 66 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary-Failure to deposit tax deducted at source-Rectification application-Directed the Assessing Officer to consider the rectification application and pass orders on merits in accordance with law. [S. 143(3), 154, 199, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Sankaranarayanan Rajshekar (2020) 269 Taxman 105 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Objections raised and the Assessing Officer has to pass reasoned order-Challenge of notice is held to be not valid. [S. 147, Art. 226]

Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 269 Taxman 120 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-One-time settlement with banker-Capital or revenue-Considered during original scrutiny assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 4, 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Everlon Synthetics (P) Ltd. (2020) 424 ITR 232 /269 Taxman 215 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Share capital-Change of opinion-Existing share holders-Subject matter of regular assessment-Reassessment notice is held to be bad in law. [S. 68, 148 Art. 226]

Uni VTL Precision (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2020) 269 Taxman 278 (Bom.)(HC).

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Defective return-Order passed without issuing show cause notice or intimation-Principle of natural justice is violated-Matter was to be restored to Assessing Officer for afresh consideration. [S. 139(9), Art. 226]

Shaikh Madar Amanulla v. ITO (2020) 269 Taxman 280 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Assessing Officer has made addition on account of two grounds-Show cause notice u/s 142 (1) was in respect of only one ground-Order set aside and reamended back for redoing the assessment. [S. 69A, 142(1), Art. 226]

Kandan & Kannan Medical Agency v. ITO (2020) 269 Taxman 291 (Mad.)(HC)