S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Sale consideration more than District level committee rate – Addition is held to be not justified .[ S.45 ] S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Sale consideration more than District level committee rate – Addition is held to be not justified .[ S.45 ]

S. 28 (i) : Business loss- Commencement of business — Purchase and sale – A single transaction may constitute business – Business expenditure are allowable and loss is entitle to carry forward . [ S. 2 (13) 37 (1) , 79 ]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Non-striking off of the irrelevant part while issuing notice under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act,- Order is bad in law – Assessee must be informed of the grounds of the penalty proceedings only through statutory notice. An omnibus notice suffers from the vice of vagueness. [ S.274 ]

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Assessee is engaged in educational activities to spread education in matters relating to tax laws, other laws and accountancy-Entitle to exemption – Order of CIT (A) denying the exemption was reversed . [ S. 2 (15), 12A, 80G ]

S. 143 : Assessment – Reassessment – Notice- Reassessment order was passed against an amalgamated company (Non -existing ) company – not procedural defect – Mere participation of the assessee in the assessment proceedings is of no effect as there is no estoppel against law- Such a defect cannot be cured by invoking section 292B – A Writ Petition can be filed in the Bombay High Court against an order passed in Delhi if the assessee is based in Mumbai. The litigant has the right to go to ‘a Court’ where part of cause of action arises. [ S. 147 ,148 , 292B , Art , 226 ]

S. 245 : Refund- Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable –
The Dept has not complied with the requirements of s. 245 of the Act- It is difficult to appreciate the stand of the Dept that the order passed by the high court would not cover/operate over the matters and orders passed by the ITAT, Union of India being not a party to the matter- Such a justification from and the approach of, the authorities is difficult to be approved of which is not in fitness of stature, especially of the state department, which is supposed to act like a model litigant- Directed to refund the amount with interest with in four weeks . [ S. 220 (6), Art ,226 ]

S.254 (1): Appellate Tribunal – Additional ground – Appeal -High Court – Matter remanded to Tribunal by High Court Additional ground was raised when the matter remanded to Appellate Tribunal – Additional ground can be raised – Tribunal is justified in admitting the additional grounds- No question of law – Amalgamation –Merger – Non exiting Company – Issue of notice and Assessment – When a company is merged with another company after the filing of return but before original assessment order is passed and the original order and subsequent order in pursuance of remand from high court, in passed in the old name, is it a curable defect u/s 292B of the Income-tax Act,1961. Matter referred to larger Bench of Delhi high court on a difference of opinion. [ S. 143 (2),143 (3), 144C, 254 (1), 260A, 292B , ITAT R, 11)

S. 153A : Assessment – HSBC Bank Geneva-No addition can be made without any incriminating documents seized in the Course of Search-When the information is not provided by Swiss Competent Authority- No addition can be made as undisclosed asset in Swiss Account- Addition was deleted-Penalty was quashed-DTAA-India-France. [S.90, 132(4), 153B(1)(a), Art.26]S. 153A : Assessment – HSBC Bank Geneva-No addition can be made without any incriminating documents seized in the Course of Search-When the information is not provided by Swiss Competent Authority- No addition can be made as undisclosed asset in Swiss Account- Addition was deleted-Penalty was quashed-DTAA-India-France. [S.90, 132(4), 153B(1)(a), Art.26]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment – Assessment order was passed without issuing show cause notice or draft assessment order -Violation of principle of natural justice – Alternative remedy is not bar – Operation of assessment order was stayed [S.143 (3), Art , 226 ]

S.144B: Faceless Assessment – Variation in income – Request made to personal hearing was not complied with – System has to be transparent and person administering it have to be accountable- Order was set aside . [ S.142 (1) , Art , 226 ]