This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S.40(a)(iib):Amounts not deductible- Royalty, licence, fee, etc. (Gallonage fee, licence fee and shop rental (kist)) -Disallowable – licence granted to assessee for retail trade could not be sustained – Surcharge on sales tax- Surcharge on sales tax or turnover tax paid by assessee-company was not a ‘fee or charge’ coming within sweep of section 40(a)(iib), thus, same could not be disallowed . [ S.37 (1) ]
Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 274 Taxman 12 / 191 DTR 267 / 316 CTR 180 (Ker.)(HC
S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Payment to contractor – Belated filing of form No 26Q- No disallowance could be made for failure to deduct tax at source [ S.194C (c)]
CIT v. Sri Parameswari Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd. (2020) 196 DTR 206 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure –Capital or revenue – Expenditure of lease premises – Allowable as revenue expenditure .
CIT v. NCR Corporation (P.) Ltd. (2020) 274 Taxman 139 / 193 DTR 66 (Karn)(HC)
S.35: Scientific research – Directed the petitioner to make representation before the competent authority and the Competent was directed to consider the said application with in four weeks of receipt of the application [ Art .226 ]
Hawkins Cookers Ltd. v. UOI (2020) 273 Taxman 507 / 196 DTR 29 / 317 CTR 843 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation – ATM can be regarded as computer – Eligible depreciation at rate of 60 % .
CIT v. NCR Corporation (P.) Ltd. (2020) 274 Taxman 139 / 193 DTR 66 (Karn)(HC)
S : 32: Depreciation – Intangible asset – Firm succeeded by Company – Revaluation of assets – Assessee is entitle to depreciation on actual cost incurred by it – 5th proviso will apply only in the year of succession and not in subsequent years and also in respect of over all quantum of depreciation in the year of succession – Order of Appellate Tribunal was quashed [ S.32 (1)(ii), 47(xiii) ]
Padmini Products (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 195 DTR 1 / 317 CTR 369 / (2021) 277 Taxman 22 (Karn.)(HC) .Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by the revenue ,Dy. CIT v. Padmini Products (P) Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 177 (SC)
S. 69A : Unexplained money – Search and seizure – Noting in diary of third party – Seized in the course of search – Without any corroborative evidence and had no authenticity, no additions could be made .[ S. 132 (4A) , 292C ]
Harmohinder Kaur. (Smt.) v. DCIT ( 2020) 204 TTJ 1 (UO) / (2021) 187 ITD 289 (Amritsar) (Trib.)
S. 68 : Cash credits – Penny stock – Accomodation entries – Sale of shares – Capital gains – Exemption – Addition cannot be made on presumption – Entitle to exemption – When no incriminating material was not found in the course of search , no addition can be made – Estimation of commission was also deleted . [ S.10 (38) 45 , 69C , 132 ,133(6), 153A]
Mahendra B.Mittal ( HUF) v .Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Mahendra Balakrishna Mittal v Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Pooja Mahendra Mittal ( Smt ) v. Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Vijayrattan Balakridhna Mittal v. Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Penalty dropped by Assessing Officer on consideration of replies – Revision order directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings was quashed [ S. 132(4), 153A, 153C, 271AAB ]
D.S.Patil v .PCIT (Bang ) ( Trib) www.itatonline.org
S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Employee’s contribution -paid before due date of filing of return –Allowable as deduction – Binding Precedent – Faceless assessment -Order of Jurisdictional High Court – binding on AO situated within territorial jurisdiction and respective first appellate authority. [ S. 2 (24)(x), 36 (1)(va), 139 (1), 143 (3) ]
Mahadev Cold Storage v. JAO ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 (Agra ) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org Vinod Thanwerdas v. JAO ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 (Agra ) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org