This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 28(i) : Business income – Income from house property — Development of software park and leasing of it —Assessable as business income- The tendency of the Revenue authorities not to follow the judgments of superior constitutional courts deserves to be strongly deprecated by imposition of suitable costs on them. [ S.22 ]

PCIT v. Khivraj Motors Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 427 ITR 113/ 193 DTR 205/ 317 CTR 184 / 274 Taxman 308 (Mad) (HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Amendment is not retrospective- Not applicable to Assessment year prior to AY 2007-08 [ S. 10(33),254(1) ]

Ingersoll-Rand (India) Ltd v .CIT (2020) 427 ITR 158/192 DTR 369 (Karn)(HC)

S. 10AA : Special Economic Zones – Expenses incurred in foreign exchange for providing technical services not includible — Profits and gains derived from onsite development of computer services outside India deemed to be derived from export of computer software outside India [ 10B ]

Mindtree Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 427 ITR 338/193 DTR 289 (Karn)(HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Interest on bank deposits includible while computing profits [ S.10B ]

CIT v. Sankhya Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 427 ITR 318 / ( 2021) 276 Taxman 254 (Mad) (HC)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Burden of proof on revenue to show income of trust was not spent for educational purposes — Matter remanded [ S .10(23C(vi) , 254(1)]

Kamaraj Educational Trust v. Chief CIT (2020) 427 ITR 74/ 118 taxmann.com 273 (Mad)(HC)

S. 5 : Scope of total income – Accrual of income — Cash compensatory assistance and duty drawback —Not sanctioned to assessee during relevant year by customs authorities — Income did not accrue- Not taxable. [ S.145 ]

CIT(LTU) v. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (2020) 427 ITR 166 / 227 Taxman 224 /192 DTR 376 (Karn)(HC)

S. 271C : Penalty – Failure to deduct at source -Leave travel allowance – Reasonable cause -Penalty not warranted[ S. 10 (5) , 133A ,273B ]

State Bank Of India v. Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 636 ( Bang) (Trib)/State Bank of India v .Add. CIT (2020) 80 ITR 11 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Not representing before CIT (A) – Matter remanded to CIT (A) [S. 250 ,254 (1) ]

United Tropicon Veneers P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 299( Cochin) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Notice not specifying charge -Natural justice — Show-cause notice void ab initio- Levy of penalty is not valid [ S.274 ]

Risha Tour And Travels v. ITO (2020) 78 ITR 77 (Luck ) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -Not specifying the charge- Notice vague — Levy of penalty not sustainable.[ S.274 ]

Rajendra Kumar Khandelwal v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 252( Jaipur) (Trib)