S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Turnover filter-To be accepted as valid comparable.
Schindler India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 84 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Turnover filter-To be accepted as valid comparable.
Schindler India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 84 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparble-Customised software development on contractual basis Job placement portal and BPO services-Dissimilarity in functions and for want of segmental accounts-Sponsorship fees and other expenses, said company was to be excluded from final set of comparables-Turnover more than 750 time cannot be considered as comparable-Profit margin-Sale of licence-Sale of software and products.
Nagarro Software (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 128 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Software development-Directed to pass speaking order-Working capital-computed by taking actual data without putting any upper limit-Ad-hoc estimate of risk differential was directed to recompute. [S. 144C]
NXP India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 163 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Functionally different-Companies having turn over of 10 times greater cannot be considered as comparable companies.
Mformation Software Technologies (I) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 78 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Software development-Size and economies of scale/high risk companies-Functionally different-providing Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) To be excluded from final list of comparables-Working capital adjustment was directed to be allowed on actual basis.
Goldman Sachs Services (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT (2020) 182 ITD 189 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-AMP expenses-TPO cannot be debarred from examining said international transaction with respect to arm’s length price.[S. 92B]
Diageo India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 362 / 205 TTJ 622 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Addition of 10 percent-Allocation of expenses-Held to be not justified.
Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 274 /77 ITR 52 (SN)/203 TTJ 691/186 DTR 50 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Tested party-Cost Plus Method (CPM)-Audit of segmental accounts-Cannot be rejected on the ground that the Accounts of overseas entities were not audited.
ACIT v. ITC Infotech India Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 101/(2021) 209 TTJ 735 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Matter remanded to the TPO-Turnover cap-Goodwill-Loss making companies-Size and Economies of Sale/High Risk Companies.
Aithent Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 169 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-ITES services did not form a single composite transaction-Transactions cannot be aggregated-Extended credit period-Addition of notional interest is held to be not justified.
ACIT v. WNS Global Services (P.) Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 59 (Mum.)(Trib.)