This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 68 : Cash credits – Journal entry – Share application money — Cheques neither presented nor encashed in accounting year- Addition cannot be made .

Deem Roll Tech Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 81 ITR 82 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S.68: Cash Credits — Unsecured Loans —Banking channels- Subsequently adjusted against booking of flat – Addition is held to be not valid .

Dy. CIT v. H. B. Associates (2020) 81 ITR 38 (SN) ( Pune) (Trib) (Pune)

S.68: Cash credits — Circuitous cash deposits – Three bank accounts – Salaried employee- Addition was confirmed to the extent of Rs 7 ,38 ,000 ]

Baidya Nath Dey v. ITO (2020) 81 ITR 28 ( SN) ( Kol)) (Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources – Income from house property —Lease —Assets – Assessable as income from other sources [ S.22, 24(a) , 56(2) (iii) ]

Telekon Media India P. Ltd. v .ITO (2020) 81 ITR 3 (SN) ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence –
Cost of improvement — Not able to establish – Indexation denied [ S.45 , 48 ]

Ashok Kumar Dusad v. ITO (2020) 81 ITR 19 (SN) Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence –
Depositing gains in capital gains accounts scheme before due date for filing return under Section 139(4) of the Act and purchasing new house within two years of transfer -Mere non-compliance with procedural requirement- Denial of exemption is not justified [ S.45 , 54(2) , 54F , 139(1) , 139(2) ]

ITO v. Rekha Shetty (Smt.) (2020) 184 ITD 38 / 81 ITR 1 (SN) (Chennai ) (Trib)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation
Transfer of litigated property — Directed to compute capital gains based on actual sale consideration received – Not established that the property was acquired – Denial of exemption is justified [ S.54F ]

Aruna Kommuri v .ACIT (2020) 81 ITR 20 (SN (Hyd) (Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Provident Fund and Employees’ State Insurance Contribution —Making contribution before due date for filing return- Allowable as deduction.[ S.36(1)(va) ]

Dy.CIT v. Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. (2020) 81 ITR 72 ( SN) (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible – Excessive or unreasonable – Transfer pricing – Royalty – Transfer pricing provision is specific provision – Assessing Officer was required to compare the royalty expenses paid in the case of the similar products by other companies during the relevant period- Disallowance is held to be not valid [ S.92C ].

De Diamond Electric India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020)81 ITR 32 (SN) / 195 DTR 97/ 207 TTJ 359(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible – Rates or tax – Education cess and higher and secondary education cess — No disallowance can be made .[ S.147 , 148 ]

Thomson Press India Ltd. v . ACIT (2020) 81 ITR 63 (SN) ( Delhi) (Trib)