This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 13 : Denial of exemption-Trust or institution-Investment restrictions-Benefit to Trustees-Interest rate of 10% was paid to trustees on unsecured loan from Trustees-Exemption cannot be denied. [S. 11, 12A, 80G]
Shaheed Kartar Singh Saraba Charitable Trust (Regd.) v. Dy.CIT(E) (2020) 84 ITR 27 (SN) (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Corpus donations-Capital receipts-Not taxable-Direction of the CIT(A) is held to be valid. [S. 2(24(iia), 12AA]
ACIT v. A. Shama Rao Foundation (2020) 84 ITR 49 (SN) (Bang.) (Trib.)
S. 10AA : Special economic zones-Transfer pricing adjustment-Deduction allowable. [S. 92C]
Eygbs (India) LLP v. Dy.CIT (2020) 84 ITR 48 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 10(34) : Dividend-Domestic companies-Tax on distribution of profits-Venture Capital Company-Entitle to [S. 10(38), 115O]
Japan International Co-Operation Agency v. ACIT(IT) (2020) 84 ITR 25 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 2(22)(e) : Dividend-Deemed dividend-Accumulated profits-Loans from subsidiary-Assessable as deemed dividend.
Assetz Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 84 ITR 59 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Show-cause Notice and penalty order not specifying the charge-Levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 274]
Sequel Alloys and Wires Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 83 ITR 190 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Ten grounds raised, only three adjudicated-Order recalled for limited purpose of considering other grounds. [S. 254(1)]
Narayan Construction v. ITO (2020) 83 ITR 599 (Cuttack)(Trib.)
S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Duties-Dismissal of appeal after eight years of filing of an appeal for not mentioning the date of receipt of the order is not mentioned in Form No 35-CIT (A) ought to have issued defect memo and should have decided the appeal on merits after considering material on record-Matter remanded. [S. 250]
Gates Unitta India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 83 ITR 462 (Chennai) (Trib.)
S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Incremental income pursuant to Advanced Pricing Agreement-Liable to pay interest.
IBM India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 83 ITR 24 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 158BD : Block assessment-Undisclosed income of any other person-Failure to transmit material-Assessment framed void and quashed. [S. 132, 158BC]
Shobha Rani (Smt.) v. ACIT (2020) 83 ITR 194 / 208 TTJ 1156 (Chd.)(Trib.) Prem Parkash v. ACIT (2020) 83 ITR 194 / 208 TTJ 1156 (Chd.) (Trib.)