S. 147 : Reassessment – No addition was made as regards reasons recorded – Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S.54F,148 ]
Sarwar Mohd. Khan v. ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 39 (SN) (Indore ) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment – No addition was made as regards reasons recorded – Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S.54F,148 ]
Sarwar Mohd. Khan v. ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 39 (SN) (Indore ) (Trib)S.147:Reassessment – Appeal To Appellate Tribunal —No specific deficiencies in cash and bank books- Generalised adverse comments- Assessing Officer to go through records and to point out specific defects and escapement of income- Matter remanded for limited verification [ S.148, 254(1) ]
K. Gurumurthy v. ITO (2020) 78 ITR 50( SN) ( Chennai) (Trib)S.147:Reassessment —Notice under section 143(2) issued on same date as return filed in response to notice — Non-application of mind- Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S.143(2) , 148 ]
Durga Ferrous P. Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 78 ITR 24 (SN) ( Delhi ) (TribS.147: Reassessment —Amalgamation- Information of amalgamation was brought to notice of Assessing Officer —Reassessment proceedings against amalgamating company is held to be void ab initio . [ S.148 ]
Dy. CIT v. Palm Tech India Ltd. (2020) 78 ITR 4 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)S.147:Reassessment — After the expiry of four years- Depreciation- Reassessment is held to be not valid .[ 148 ]
W. B. Engineers International P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 78 ITR 21 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)S.147:Reassessment — After the expiry of four years- Depreciation- Reassessment is held to be not valid .[ 148 ]
W. B. Engineers International P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 78 ITR 21 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)S.147: Reassessment — Reassessment-After the expiry of four years- Before six years —Reasons vague and inconclusive — Reassessment not valid [ S.148 ]
Sumer S. Sanghvi v. ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 20 (SMC) (Ahd) (Trib)S. 145A : Method of accounting – Valuation – Changed method -No need to apply changed method to opening stock of finished goods at beginning of previous year – Accounting Standard 2 .
ACIT v. Thiagarajar Mills Ltd. (2020) 78 ITR 8 (SN)/ (2021) 186 ITD 279 ( Chennai) (Trib)S.143(3): Assessment – Ad -hoc addition- Weight and rate difference – Evidence not produced – Addition is held to be justified [ S.37(1) ]
Barnala Steel Industries Ltd. v JCIT (2020) 78 ITR 29(SN) (Delhi) (Trib)S.115BBE: Tax on income -Unexplained money — Survey – Surrender of income as business income – Rate of tax — Source of excess cash, excess stock and unaccounted receivables not explained — Taxable at 60 per. Cent. [ S.68 , 69, 69A, 69C, 133A ]
Rajesh Kumar Bajaj v .ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 79 ( SN) (Indore) (Trib)