S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Order is barred by limitation.[ S.92CA (3A), 143(3) 153]
Johnson & Johanson (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT(2023) 225 TTJ 241 (Mum)(Trib)S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Order is barred by limitation.[ S.92CA (3A), 143(3) 153]
Johnson & Johanson (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT(2023) 225 TTJ 241 (Mum)(Trib)S. 143(3): Assessment-Return-Refund-Amalgamation-Non-existent entity-Credit for taxes paid-Assessing Officer is bound to give credit of taxes paid under section 199 and allow refund of tax in accordance with law. [ S.139, 139(9) 199, 237]
Star India (P) Ltd v. ACIT(2023) 224 TTJ 985 (Mum)(Trib)S. 143(3): Assessment-Final assessment order is passed-Assessing Officer had no powers to either withdraw or modify or substitute assessment order passed under section 143(3) with another assessment order. [ S. 144C]
Urvashi Narain v. ITO (2023) 225 TTJ 131/ 156 taxmann.com 189 / (2024) 110 ITR 670 (Delhi)(Trib)S. 143(3): Assessment-Limited scrutiny-Unsecured loan-Notice beyond scope of limited scrutiny-CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016, dated 14-7-2016-Assessment is bad in law. [ S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1), 68, 119]
Sukhdham Infrastructures LLP v. ITO (2024) 165 taxmann.com 154 / 226 TTJ 497 (Kol)(Trib.)S. 143(3): Assessment-Document Identification Number (DIN)-Assessment order without obtaining Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid-No jurisdiction-Order passed without issuing the notice u/s 143(2)-Order is quashed.[ S.143(2), 144, 147]
Bangalore Narayan Das v. ITO (IT) (2023) 157 taxmann.com 605 / 226 TTJ 66 (Bang)(Trib.)S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Additional ground is admitted-Order is barred by limitation.[ S. 153B, 254(1)
Dy.CIT v. Shan Lal Arora (2023) 225 TTJ 289 (Chd)(Trib) Rajiv Kumar v. ACIT (2023) 225 TTJ 289 (Chd)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Purchase of shares from Associated Enterprise-DCF method-Adjustment is deleted-Transactions under taken by the promoters / share holders of the company-Sale of shares using CUP method-Gap of three months-Matter remanded to the TPO.[ R. 10B(5)]
TPG Growth II Market PTE Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(2023) 224 TTJ 789 /153 taxmann.com 368 (Mum)(Trib)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax- International transaction-Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM)-Tested party-Loan to Associated enterprise-Adjustment of interest-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after granting due opportunity of being heard.
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 372 / 226 TTJ 361 (Mum)(Trib.)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax- International transaction-Sale of electricity from its Power Plant unit to its manufacturing unit-Per unit electricity sold to non-eligible unit at Rs. 6.90 per unit was market value, assessee is justified in adopting ALP of electricity supply to its AEs at rate charged by Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB). [ 80IA(8),92F(ii)]
Tata Chemicals Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023) 155 taxmann.com 461/ 226 TTJ 973 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 92BA : Transfer pricing-Specified domestic transaction-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-Omitted with effect from Ist April 2017-No saving clause-Order is bad in law.
Worship Infraprojects (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT(2023) 226 TTJ 649 (Jaipur)(Trib)