This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Comparable Benchmarking of Transaction — Marketing support services same functions – Can be treated as comparable —Deriving its income from manufacturing or trading and indenting services — Not good Comparable for company rendering market support services.

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 84 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Debt-free company —Adjustment in relation to notional interest on overdue receivables is held to be not justified- Comparable – Company having controlled transactions — High brand value and high turnover of company —Held not comparables.

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 305 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 80IB: Industrial undertakings – Sub-Licensing income — Royalty — Not related to manufacturing activity – Income excludible on net basis after adjusting loyalty paid against sub-licensing income [ S.80IC ]

Ultimate Flexipack Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 410( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 74 : Losses – Long-term capital loss — Reduction of share capital — Amounts to transfer —Loss arising due to cancellation of shares allowable as long-term capital loss eligible to be carried forward to subsequent years [ S.2(47) ]

Carestream Health Inc. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 599/ 193 DTR 41/206 TTJ 835 (Mum)(Trib)

S.68: Cash credit — Unsecured loan — Failure to prove genuineness – Addition is held to be justified .

Rajesh Passi v .ITO (2020)78 ITR 221 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Bogus purchases from bogus firm — Forensic Expert’s report showing that account of firm operated in handwriting of assessee and all deposits and withdrawals made in handwriting of assessee —Not availing of opportunity to cross-examine forensic expert —Addition is held to be justified — Addition on account of bogus sales out of bogus purchases will result in double addition — Addition on debit entry to be deleted . [ S.145 ]

Puneet Jain v. ITO (2020)78 ITR 41/ 208 TTJ 1011(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Share application money – Source of investment, identity and creditworthiness of investors and genuineness of transaction established – Addition is held to be not valid . [ S.14A, 131, 153A ]

Nimbus (India) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 648 / (20021) 209 TTJ 986/ 199 DTR 273 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Share application money — Accommodation entries — Entry provider in his statement not stating investor company one of concerns controlled by him — Assumption Of accommodation entries vitiated by fact -Addition unsustainable.

ITO v. Skyways Industrial Estate Co. P. Ltd. (2020)78 ITR 320 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Share application money — Nature and source satisfactorily explained —Addition is held to be not valid – Derivative loss – Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .

Rosewood Buildwell P. Ltd. v. ITO (2020)78 ITR 592 (Delhi) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Advance receipt from parties —Excess amount offered to tax in subsequent year — Advance receipt not taxable as cash credit.

Ultimate Flexipack Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 410 ( Delhi) (Trib)