This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Unexplained purchases-Disallowance of 20%-Disallowance of entire purchase by passing a rectification order is held to be not valid. [S. 69C, 143(3)]
DCIT v. Gulshan Chemicals Ltd. (2020) 184 ITD 71 / 208 TTJ 1053 / ((2021) 197 DTR 274 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Share capital-Items already disclosed in original return and balance sheet-In absence of recovery of any incriminating material for making said addition in hands of assessee, said addition was to be deleted. [S. 68]
Alankar Saphire Developers v. DCIT (2020) 81 ITR 549 / 184 ITD 847 / (2021) 209 TTJ 491 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Several incriminating materials were found during course of search-Assessing Officer can interfere with original assessment while making assessment. [S. 143(1)(a)]
N. Roja v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 329 / 196 DTR 134 / 208 TTJ 603 (Cuttack) (Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Sales promotion expenses-No new information-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 37(1), 148]
Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 8 / 207 TTJ 143 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Under invoicing-Cash credits-Report of commission- Reassessment proceedings initiated merely on basis of report of a Commission appointed by Central Government that there was under invoicing of exports-Held to be bad in law-Pronouncement of order-Period during which lockdown was in force in country due to COVID 19 pandemic was to be excluded. [S. 68, 148, 255, ITAT R. 35]
Ashapura Minichem Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 81 ITR 111 / 184 ITD 278 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Internal audit objection-Reimbursement of expenses-Failure to deduct tax at source-Reassessment is held to be not valid-90 days time period permitted under Rule 34(5) for pronouncing order was to be computed by deducting Covid-19 pandemic lockdown period. [S. 40(a)(ia), 148, 195, 255, ITATR. 34(5)]
Lionbridge Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 184 ITD 61 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rehabilitation and implementation of water supply-Percentage of contract method adopted by the assessee is held to be justified.
Veolia India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 528 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account without providing an opportunity is held to be not valid-Cash credits-Rejection of documents without any reason is held to be not justified-Matter remanded. [S. 68]
Ramanlal K. Darji v. ITO (2020) 184 ITD 408 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Succession to business otherwise than on death-Amalgamating company was not in existence at time of conduct of assessment proceedings as well as on date of passing Assessment Order-Assessment Order passed in name of amalgamating company being void ab initio was to be set aside. [S. 170, 292B]
Genpact India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Computation for purpose of clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without restoring to computation as contemplated under section 14A, read with rule 8D. [S. 14A, R. 8D]
Zaveri & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 184 ITD 777 (Ahd.)(Trib.)