This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Ex parte dismissal of appeal-Matter remanded to CIT(A) to re adjudicate the appeal on merit. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i)]
Children Aid Society Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 183 ITD 616 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 234E : Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Delay in submitting the return-Levy of late fee is mandatory. [S. 200(3)]
Block Development Officer v. ACIT (2020) 183 ITD 334/193 DTR 249/206 TTJ 862 (Jaipur)(Trib.)
S. 206C : Collection at source-Scrap-Purchase of scrap material from railways which was subjected to TCS, resale of same material by assessee would not partake a different character and he would be held-in default for non collection of tax at time of resale. [S. 206C(6A) 206C(7)]
Pramod Kumar Jain v. ITO (2020) 183 ITD 442/206 TTJ 25 (UO) (Jaipur)(Trib.)
S. 194I : Deduction at source-Rent-State Government-Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti-Income exempt-Not liable to tax at source. [S.10(26AAB)]
M.P. Warehousing & Logistics Corporation v. ACIT (2020) 183 ITD 485 /195 DTR 89/ 84 ITR 75 / 207 TTJ 743 (Indore) (Trib.)
S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Interest payable to any of individual account holder did not exceed Rs. 2,500 in a Financial year-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 201]
DCIT v. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. (2020) 183 ITD 266 /194 DTR 153/207 TTJ 555 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 167B : Charge of tax-Shares of members unknown-Association of person (AOP)-Income of its Members exceeded basic exemption limit-Liable to be taxed at maximum marginal rate. [Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Air Force Navy Farm Owners Welfare Association v. ITO (2020) 183 ITD 611 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Transfer of land used for agricultural purposes-Whether HUF is entitle to exemption-Debatable-Rectification order is held to be not valid. [S. 54B]
Sandeep Bhargava (‘HUF’) v. CIT (2020) 83 ITR 217 / 183 ITD 437 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Recorded reasons-Failure to provide complete details of reasons recorded and not merely few extracts of said reasons-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 147]
Wimco Seedlings Ltd. v. JCIT (2020) 82 ITR 235 / 183 ITD 211 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Information from Local Authority stating that building competition certificate was not issued-Reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 80IB(10) 148]
Harshvardhan Constructions. v. ITO (2020) 81 ITR 299 / 183 ITD 497 / 207 TTJ 663 (Mum.)(Trib.)