This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors-Payment made to farmers for purchase of sugarcane as harvesting charges-Not liable to TDS-No disallowance can be made. [S. 40(a)(ia)]

DCIT v. NSL Sugars (2019) 76 ITR 1 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors-Finance Act states that it would be applicable from a particular date–Section cannot be applied retrospectively. [S. 40(a)(ia), 194(6), 263]

Oruganti Sowbhagyam v. DCIT (2019) 76 ITR 79 (SN) (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person–Search Seized documents not belonging to assessee-No incriminating documents / materials seized–Addition cannot be sustained.

Unicon Merchants P. Ltd. v. JCIT (2019) 76 ITR 381 (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment–Search-Time limit for issue of notice u/s.143(2) and completion of assessment already lapsed as on date of search-An addition is unsustainable. [S. 143(2)]

Dy. CIT v. Forum Sales P. Ltd. (2019) 76 ITR 51 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment–Search-Assessee was not in existence at time of first search–No documents found in second search belonging to assessee-Payment of interest on post-dated cheques outside books beyond six months from sale deed-No addition could be sustained.

Utkarsh Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019)76 ITR 688 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Approval of commissioner in a mechanical manner without due application of mind and mentioning only “yes”-Reassessment is not sustainable. [S. 147, 148]

Blue Chip Developers P. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 58 (SN.) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Reopening on same issue merely for making fishing or roving inquiries is impermissible in law. [S. 148]

Anurag v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 38 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Notice-Notice was neither served upon assessee nor sent at proper address–Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 148]

Vikrant Tiwari v. ITO (2019)76 ITR 310 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reopening without jurisdiction-Non recording of satisfaction that income has escaped assessment by reason of failure on the part of Assessee to disclose material facts and hence quashed reopening proceedings.[S. 148]

Nandam Exim Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 76 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded and additions made–CIT(A) deleted some additions which formed part of reasons–other additions not part of reasons survived-held no other addition could survive in respect of which reasons are not recorded. [S. 148]

Naresh Kumar Garg, Prop. Grag Electricals v. ACIT (2019) 76 ITR 18 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)