S. 192 : Deduction at source – Salary – Reimbursement of expenditure incurred by them towards uniform on the basis of self certification by employees – Not liable to deduct tax at source . [ S. 10 (14)(i) , 201 (IA )

S.149 : Reassessment – Time limit for notice – Direction of CIT (A) – Reassessment barred by limitation cannot be reopened – Reassessment was quashed . [ S.143(1), 149(1)(b) ]

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice – When alternative remedy of appeal is available under statute, it would not be appropriate and proper for High Court to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction conferred on High Court .[ S.147 , Art , 226 ]

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice –Alternative remedy – Writ petition dismissed -Order of Single Judge is affirmed [ S. 147, Art , 226 ]

S. 148 : Reassessment –Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer – Proceedings initiated under section 148 shall be proceedings at stage of filing of return under section 139 of the Act- Directed the Assessing Officer to take appropriate decision within a period of one month of the receipt of the copy of judgement . [ S. 124(2), 147 Art , 226 ]

S. 148 : Reassessment – Non -Resident Indian – Notice issued by Madurai Income tax Officer when the assessee is staying in Shimoga Karnataka is held to be bad law and without jurisdiction [ S. 120 , 127 , 147 Art , 226 ]

S. 147 : Reassessment – Survey – Failure to furnish details of invoices for expenses- Reassessment is held to be valid [ S. 37(1),133A, 148 , Art , 226 ]S. 147 : Reassessment – Survey – Failure to furnish details of invoices for expenses- Reassessment is held to be valid [ S. 37(1),133A, 148 , Art , 226 ]

S. 147 : Reassessment – Depreciation – Water supply and drainage – Allowed depreciation at 15%- Issue was subject matter of revision and considering the reply the revision proceedings were dropped – Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S. 32 , 148, 263]

S. 147 : Reassessment – Depreciation – Water supply and drainage – Allowed depreciation at 15%- Issue was subject matter of revision and considering the reply the revision proceedings were dropped – Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S. 32 , 148, 263]

S.147: Reassessment- After the expiry of four years- Product development expenditure – Capital or revenue – Reassessment is held to be bad in law [ S.37 (1) ]

S. 145 : Method of accounting – Change in revenue recognisation method – Held to be justified .