This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.254(1): Appellate Tribunal – Duties – Additional evidence —Failure by Appellate Tribunal to exercise jurisdiction vested in it — Matter Remanded to Appellate Tribunal [ S.69C 260A ATR, 1963 , R.29 ]

Braganza Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020)425 ITR 115 / 193 DTR 332 (Panaji ) (Bom)(HC )

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Natural Justice —Additional evidence — Opposing party should be given opportunity to rebut evidence — Tribunal cannot reliance upon a google study in order to have an idea about the air pollution control equipment without giving an opportunity to rebut the evidence – Order of Appellate Tribunal set aside [ S. 131(1) , 255(6) ]

Ramco Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 426 ITR 388 / 273 Taxman 364/ (2021) 201 DTR 84 / 320 CTR 616(Mad)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers- Remand – order passed on the basis of remand report in which the Assessing Officer has accepted the contention of the assessee – Order of Appellate Tribunal is affirmed . [ S .250(4) ]

CIT v .D. M. Purnesh (2020) 426 ITR 169 (Karn)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission -Full and true disclosure-Income offered in application-Additional income offered during proceedings in order to avoid controversy – No new source of income —Acceptance of offer and passing of order by Settlement Commission is held to be justified .[ S. 133A, 245C , 245D(4) , ITSC (P)Rules, 1997. R.9 , Art , 226 ]

PCIT v. Shankarlal Nebhumal Uttamchandani (2020) 425 ITR 235 /186 DTR 169/ 114 taxmann.com 638/ 270 Taxman 41/313 CTR 184 (Guj) (HC), Editorial: SLP filed by the revenue ,notice issued , returnable on 12 -3 2021, in the meanwhile , the effect and operation of the order presently underchallenge shall remain stayed , PCIT v. Shankarlal Nebhumal Uttamchan ( 2021) 279 Taxman 326 ( SC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission – Amendment in law — Payment of additional tax on additional amount disclosed within time prescribed — Settlement Commission has jurisdiction to proceed with application – Failure to consider report filed by department — Matter remanded to Settlement Commission for disposal afresh. [ S.245C(1),245D(2A), 245D(4) ITSC (Procedure) Rules, 1997, R. 9, Art .226 ]

CIT v. ITSC (2020) 425 ITR 568 / 192 DTR 217/ 273 Taxman 264(Mad)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission – Settlement of cases –Territorial Jurisdiction of Madras High Court — Order of Bench of Settlement Commission at Chennai — Petition not maintainable -Place where cause of action arises – Doctrine of Forum Conveniens .[ S. 132, 226 ]

Mulberry Silks Ltd v .ITST (2020) 426 ITR 444 / 117 Taxman 62/ 274 Taxmann 320/ (2021) 201 DTR 56 (Mad) (HC)

S.241A: Refund- Withholding of refund in certain cases – Mere pendency of the proceedings under S. 143(2) in itself is not enough to withhold the refund .[ S. 143(1) ,143 (2), Art .226 ]

Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt Ltd v .UOI (2020)426 ITR 572 / 195 DTR 233 / 317 CTR 571 (P&H)(HC)

S. 237 : Refund -Order of refund attaining finality- Department cannot adjust admitted refund against future dues yet to be adjudicated —Entitle to refund- Department Withholding refund of Assessment Year 2014-15 — Provisions not attracted to refund of assessment Year 2014-15 or any Assessment year prior to Assessment Year 2017-18. [ S.143(1) 144C ,154, 241A , 245 Art , 226 ]

Vodafone Idea Ltd v. ACIT (2020)425 ITR 691/ 272 Taxman 335 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. Vodafone Idea Ltd (2020) 272 Taxman 406 ( SC)

S. 237 : Refund -Order of refund attaining finality- Department cannot adjust admitted refund against future dues yet to be adjudicated —Entitle to refund- Department Withholding refund of Assessment Year 2014-15 — Provisions not attracted to refund of assessment Year 2014-15 or any Assessment year prior to Assessment Year 2017-18. [ S.143(1) 144C ,154, 241A , 245 Art , 226 ]

Vodafone Idea Limited v. ACIT (2020)425 ITR 691 / 272 Taxman 335(Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. Vodafone Idea Ltd (2020) 272 Taxman 406 ( SC)

S. 234B : Interest – Advance tax – Paying four instalments of advance tax prior to search and seizure- Communication sent to adjust advance tax against cash seized during search — Date of communication to be taken as date of payment of advance tax [ S.132B 234C ]

Marble Centre International P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020)425 ITR 654 / 192 DTR 337/316 CTR 1/ 272 Taxman 248 (Karn)(HC) / Rpg Marble Pvt. Ltd. v ACIT (2020)425 ITR 654 / 192 DTR 337/316 CTR 1/ 272 Taxman 248 (Karn)(HC)