This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.276C: Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax False statement in verification — Abetment of false return — Limitation —Limitation inapplicable to prosecution for certain Economic Offences — Prosecution of Members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies – — Transfer of case for Trial to Designated Court — No prejudice caused to assesses- Prosecution based on materials recovered in search and not launched based only on statements of third parties — Prosecution valid – Prosecution not barred by limitation [S. 132, 148, 277, 278, 280A 280B Economic Offences (Inapplicability Of Limitation) Act, 1974 , Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.6(1), 26 ,200 397 ]

Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram v. Dy .DCIT (2020) 424 ITR 30/ 193 DTR 217/ 316 CTR 502 (Mad) (HC) Karti P. Chidambaram v. Dy. DCIT(Inv) (2020)424 ITR 30/193 DTR 217/ 316 CTR 502 (Mad) (HC)

S. 271B :Penalty- Failure to get accounts audited – Audit conducted under provisions of Co-Operative Societies Act — No Report by Accountant — Levy of penalty justified . [ S.44AB, 273B ]

Peroorkkada Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v ITO (2020)424 ITR 422 / 270 Taxman 55(Ker) (HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment- Survey – Before due date of filing of return- Amount disclosed in the return- Return accepted without additions- Levy of penalty is held to be not valid [ S.132, 133A ,139(1) ]

PCIT v. Yamunaji Corporation (2020) 424 ITR 369 (Guj) (HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -Capital or revenue- Claim for deduction disallowed – Penalty cannot be levied .

PCIT v. CLP Power India Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 424 ITR 98 (Guj)(HC) )

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Delay of 3345 days – Abetment of appeal due to death of the assesse – Delay was not explained – Application for condonation of delay was rejected and appeal was dismissed as abated [ S.220(2A) ]

CIT v. V. M. Varghese a d Another (2020) 424 ITR 561 (Ker)(HC)

S.260A: Appeal to High Court -Rule of consistency — Taxability of profits of overseas branches of assessee — Earlier year order of Appellate Tribunal was accepted- Precluded from raising point for later year – Appellate Tribunal – Powers – Subsidy – Capital or revenue – New issues can be raised first time before the Appellate Tribunal on the basis of material already on the record .[ S. 4, 254(1)

PCIT v. Grasim Industries Ltd. (2020) 424 ITR 236 (Bom)(HC)

S.254(1) : Appellate Tribunal- Duties- Tribunal bound to give reasons for reversing findings rendered by lower authorities — Deletion of addition is held to be not justified .[ S.132(4) , 158BA, 158BC]

CIT v. Dr. K. Kannagi (2020) 424 ITR 470/ 194 DTR 145 / 316 CTR 695 (Mad) (HC) CIT v. Dr. N. Rajkumar (2020) 424 ITR 470/ 194 DTR 145 / 316 CTR 695 (Mad) (HC)

S.244A: Refund – Interest on refunds – Retention of impounded cash- — Delay of more than three years after finalisation of assessment in refunding amount seized —Entitled to interest from date of order passed by Assessing Officer till date of payment- Right to property – Retention of impounded cash without any authority of Law is violation of Article 300A of Constitution. [ 132B(4) , 153A , 263, Art .300A ]

Jiwan Kumar v. PCIT (2020) 424 ITR 296/ 194 DTR 20/ 316 CTR 767 (P&H)(HC)

S.234E: Fee-Default in furnishing the statements- Deduction of tax at source — Fee of Rs 200 for every day -Constitutional validity – Compensatory levy for extra burden on Income-Tax Department- Provision is valid .[ S.271H , Art , 14, 226 ]

Qatalys Software Technologies Pvt Ltd v. v UOI (2020)424 ITR 143/ 192 DTR 341/ 316 CTR 5/ 272 Taxman 119 (Mad) (HC)/QSource Global Consulting (P) Ltd v. UOI (2020)424 ITR 143 / 192 DTR 341/ 316 CTR 5/ 272 Taxman 119 (Mad) (HC)/Jean Park (India )(P) Ltd v.ITO (2020)424 ITR 143 / 192 DTR 341/ 316 CTR 5/ 272 Taxman 119 (Mad) (HC

S. 226 : Collection and recovery – Modes of recovery – Garnishee proceedings- Recovery effected on same day and garnishee proceedings initiated with in two days of amount becoming due – Guide lines – Order of single judge modified . [ S.80P(4), 226(3) (iii) ]

Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2020)424 ITR 283/ 194 DTR 140 / 317 CTR 111(Ker) (HC) Editorial : Order of single judge is modified .