S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Capital or revenue Computer software expenses — Legal expenses incurred in connection with sale of capital assets – Held to be revenue expenditure .
PCIT v. Aker Powergas Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 536 (Bom)(HC)S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Capital or revenue Computer software expenses — Legal expenses incurred in connection with sale of capital assets – Held to be revenue expenditure .
PCIT v. Aker Powergas Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 536 (Bom)(HC)S. 36(1)(viia) :Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts – Co-Operative Bank — Deduction for 10 Per Cent. of aggregate advances of Rural Branches – Not allowable .
Ernakulam District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v CIT (2020) 423 ITR 308 (Ker)(HC)S.36(1)(vii): Bad Debts —Lottery and financing business- Advance of money- Amounts written off in accounts — Held to be allowable . [ S.36 (1), 36(2) ]
Deccan Agency v. Dy CIT (2020) 423 ITR 418 (Mad) (HC)S.36(1)(vii) ; Bad debts- Part of current assets – Allowable as bad debt .
PCIT v. Lee and Muirhead Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 167 (Bom) (HC)S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees – Employees’ Contribution to Provident Fund and Employees’ State Insurance — Delay in payment- Tribunal remanding the issue before Assessing Officer – Held to be erroneous .[S. 2(24)(X), 36(1)(Va) , Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, S. 38. ]
PCIT v. Suzlon Energy Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 608 (Guj) (HC)S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital — Amount used to assist sister concern — Interest not deductible.
Yenepoya Resins and Chemicals v .Dy CIT (2020)423 ITR 161/ 196 DTR 427/ 271 Taxman 271 (Karn)(HC)S.32: Depreciation — Rate of depreciation —Hiring out construction Equipment —Crane depreciation allowable at 30% – It cannot be reduced to 15% – Res Judicata —Not strictly applicable but consistency essential.
.
S.32: Depreciation —Uninterrupted power supply system for Computers —Entitled to depreciation at 60 Per Cent.
CIT v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 122 (Mad)(HC)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Investment from borrowed capital – Presumption that advances made out of interest free funds- No facts pleaded for apportionment – Deletion of addition is held to be justified [S.36(1)(iii), R. 8D ]
PCIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 220/ 273 Taxman 167 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed , PCIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd. (2022) 288 Taxman 661 (SC)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – No expenditure was incurred – Disallowances cannot be made . [ R.8D ]
PCIT v. Lee and Muirhead Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 167 (Bom) (HC)