S. 80IC : Special category States–Profit of undertaking is eligible for deduction–Disallowance of purchase is held to be not valid. [S.80A(5)]
PCIT v. Laxmi Electronic (2020) 186 DTR 373 / 312 CTR 310 (Uttarakhand) (HC)S. 80IC : Special category States–Profit of undertaking is eligible for deduction–Disallowance of purchase is held to be not valid. [S.80A(5)]
PCIT v. Laxmi Electronic (2020) 186 DTR 373 / 312 CTR 310 (Uttarakhand) (HC)Constitution of India
362 : Corona Virus Lockdown Crisis – Extension of interim orders – Expiring before 30 -04 -2020 – Shall continue to operate till then – Interim orders which are not granted for limited duration are to operate till further orders shall remain unaffected by this order .[ Art . 226, 227 ]
Court on its own Motion ( Bom) (HC ) www.itat online .org.S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Back ward area-Not located in the industrial backward district which has been mentioned in the notification issued by the Central Govt-Not entitle to deduction. [S. 80HH(2), 80IA(2)(iv)(c)]
CIT v. Endeka Ceramics (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Johnson Mathey Ceramics India Ltd.) (2020) 423 ITR 117/ 186 DTR 369 / 313 CTR 238 (Karn.)(HC)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Writ of mandamus or otherwise to respondent to notify the Industrial Park of the petitioner under Rule 18C of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. [S. 80IB (10), Art. 226]
Softzone Tech Park Ltd. v. CBDT (2020) 421 ITR 398 / 185 DTR 92 / 312 CTR 289 (Karn.)(HC)S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Separate and independent unit-Common excise registration-Common electricity-Common water connection-Not an extension of existing units-Different products manufactured–Written down value of machinery transferred was less than 20 % of the value. [S. 80IB]
PCIT v. Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2020) 185 DTR 213/ 317 CTR 599 (Bom.) (HC)S. 56 : Income from other sources–Relative–Gift from brother in law is relative-Cash credits–No addition can be made as cash credits–Genuineness is established. [S. 56(2)(vii), 68, 132]
PCIT v. Arvind N. Nopany (2020) 185 DTR 369 / 313 CTR 87 (Guj.) (HC)S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Contractors-Provisions are not applicable where neither the assessee nor the party engaged by assessee was a contractor-No disallowances can be made. [S. 194(c)]
ACIT v. Alfran Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 186 DTR 53/ 313 CTR 365 (Bom.) (HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Sales promotion expenses–Held to be allowable as business expenditure.
PCIT v. Merck Ltd. (2020) 185 DTR 401 / 312 CTR 242/ 275 Taxman 181 / ( 2021 ) 434 ITR 596 (Bom.) (HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Capital or revenue–Buy back of shares-Held to be revenue expenditure.
PCIT v. Merck Ltd. (2020) 185 DTR 401 / 312 CTR 242 / 275 Taxman 181 / ( 2021 ) 434 ITR 596(Bom.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Capital or revenue–Buy back of shares-Held to be revenue expenditure.
PCIT v. Merck Ltd. (2020) 185 DTR 401 / 312 CTR 242/ 275 Taxman 181/ ( 2021 ) 434 ITR 596 (Bom.)(HC)