S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Purchase of three units-Possible view -Revision is held to be not valid [S. 54, 54F]
PCIT v. Minal Nayan Shah (2020) 428 ITR 23/ 275 Taxman 540 (Guj.)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Purchase of three units-Possible view -Revision is held to be not valid [S. 54, 54F]
PCIT v. Minal Nayan Shah (2020) 428 ITR 23/ 275 Taxman 540 (Guj.)(HC)S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Export of computer software-Development of software at client’s site outside India-Assessing Officer taking one of two plausible views-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 10A]
CIT v. Aztec Software Technology Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 245/ 275 Taxman 206 (Karn.)(HC)S. 260A : Appeal – High Court -Refusing to frame question as substantial question of law – High Court cannot review its decision.
CIT v. V. M. Salgaonkar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 386 / 317 CTR 529 / 195 DTR 241/( 2021) 277 Taxman 469 (Bom.)(HC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court -Monetary Limit-Case not falling within exception-Appeal not maintainable.
PCIT v. Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-Operative Society (2020) 428 ITR 264 / 274 Taxman 397 (HP)(HC)S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Monetary limit-Notification dated 11-7-2018 of Central Board Of Direct Taxes-Case not falling within Exception-Appeal not maintainable. [S. 253, 254(2)]
PCIT v. Ambuja Darla Kashlog Mangoo Transport Co-Operative Society (2020) 428 ITR 94 / 269 Taxman 618 / 317 CTR 363 / 195 DTR 99 (HP)(HC)S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Assess ability of capital gains-New plea could not have been considered by the Tribunal-Re assessment-Limitation- Reassessment proceedings were not barred by limitation-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 149, 150, 254(1)]
CIT v. Emgeeyar Pictures P. Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 341 / 317 CTR 148 / 194 DTR 273 / (2021) 276 Taxman 335 (Mad.)(HC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Order passed without considering submission that case was covered by earlier decisions of Tribunal-Matter remanded. [S. 273B]
M. Palani Adaicalam v. ACIT (2020) 428 ITR 47 / ( 2021) 277 Taxman 176(Mad.)(HC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non speaking order by the Appellate Tribunal-Matter remanded. [S. 50B, 147, 148, 253]
CIT v. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 539 (Mad.)(HC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Accumulation of income-Failure by Tribunal to consider relevant facts-Matter remanded to Tribunal. [S. 11(2), 253 Form No. 10]
CNN Educational Trust v. ITO (2020) 428 ITR 312 (Mad.)(HC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Claims though not raised in return or revised return-Appellate Authorities must consider the claim if facts are on record-There is no estoppel in taxation law- Contradictory claim can be raised. [S. 250]
Areva T & D India Ltd. v. CIT (2020) 428 ITR 1 / 317 CTR 633 / 195 DTR 361 (Mad.)(HC)