This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Addition cannot be made without referring the matter to DVO- Power of Attorney holder does not became the owner of property on signing the sale deed in the capacity as constituted attorney [ S.45 ]

Ramesh Govindbhai Patel v .ITO ( 2020) 118 taxman. com 201 ( Ahd) (Trib)

S. 45(2) : Capital gains – Conversion of a capital asset in to stock-in-trade – Asset received under family arrangement treated as stock in trade – Addition cannot be made as capital gains. [ S.2(14), 49(1)]

CIT v. C. Ramaiah Reddy ( 2020) 272 Taxman 342/ 117 taxmann.com 540/ 192 DTR 425/ 316 CTR 370 ( Karn) (HC)

S.45: Capital gains – Development rights – Business assets -Accrual of income – Provisions of Section 2(47) r.w.s 53A of the Transfer of property Act 1882 are not applicable to transfer of development rights held by assessee as business assets [ S. 2(47)(v),44AD, 145 , Transfer of Property Act , 1882 , S.53A]

ITO v. Abdul Kayam Ahmed Moham Tamboli ( 2020) The Chamber’s Journal -August P. 119 ( Mum) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains- Reduction in share capital- Compensation received by an existing partner on reduction of his share in the partnership firm is not liable gains tax [ S. 2(47), 4, 45(1) , 45(4)

Anik Industries Ltd v. DCIT ( 2020) 116 taxmann.com 385 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax – Remission or cessation of trading liability – Waiver of loan is neither taxable u/s 41(1) nor u/s 28(v ) of the Act .[ S.28 (v) ]

ITO v. Sri Vasavi Polymers Pvt Ltd ( 2020) 2020] 117 taxmann.com 236 ( Vishakha) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Capital or revenue- Repair and renovation of leased premises – Revenue expenditure – Power of CIT (A) – Cannot travel beyond the direction of the ITAT order [ S.250, 254(1)]

Aspect Research & Management P. Ltd v. ITO ( 2020) The Chamber’s Journal – June -P 81 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – One time payment of annual lease rent is held to be allowable as revenue expenditure

Multitute Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Dy .CIT ( 2020) The Chamber’s Journal – March – P .123 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 36(1)(viii) : Eligible business – Business of providing long term finance for construction or purchase of houses in India – AO is directed to examine the issue [ S.254(1)

DCIT v. Repco Home Finance Pvt Ltd ( 2020) 83 ITR 530 / 183 ITD 782 / 117 taxmmann.com 233 ( Chennai) (Trib)

S. 22 : Income from house property –Un sold flat held as stock in trade- Annual value Rental income assessable as business income- [ S.28(i)]

Osho Developers v .ACIT ( 2020) BCAJ-December -P 43/ www.itatonline.org ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 271AAA : Penalty – Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007 –Unexplained cash —Not giving any plausible reply to satisfy search team or Assessing Officer during course of assessment proceedings — Levy of penalty is held to be justified.

Nitesh Munje v .ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 14 (SN) (Indore ) (Trib)