This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution- charitable trust – Entitle to exemption .[ S.2(15) ,10(23C)(iv) , 12AA ]

CIT ( E ) v. GS1 India (Formerly Ean India) (2019) 266 Taxman 279 ( Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue ; CIT ( E) v. GS1 India (Formerly Ean India) (2019) 266 Taxman 278 (SC)

S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions–Sanction-Chief Commissioner –Wilful attempt to evade tax–Non-technical offence–False statement in verification- Reduction of penalty by CIT (A)-Prosecution cannot proceed–Compounding of offences-Application for compounding to be considered by committee specified in circular–DGIT has no jurisdiction to reject the application. [S. 119, 120, 276C(1), 273B, 277, 279(IA), 279(2), Art.141]

K. M. Mammen v. DIT (2019) 418 ITR 157/( 2020) 186 DTR 78/(2020) 314 CTR 467 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Notice–Not specifying the charge – Defects could be rectified–Notice is not invalid–Writ to quash the notice is held to be not maintainable. [S. 292B, Art.226]

Amtex Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 99/ ( 2020) 186 DTR 20 / 313 CTR 216(Mad.)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Procedure–It is statutorily imperative to give a personal hearing while disposing of an appeal-Ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) confirming the addition is set aside. [Art. 226]

Gemini Film Circuit v. CIT (2019) 266 Taxman 216/ (2020) 186 DTR 366/ 313 CTR 126 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission–Bogus share capital and share premium-Failure to make full and true disclosure with regard to undisclosed income by way of bogus share capital and share premium and also manner of earning such income- Settlement Commission is justified in rejecting settlement application on such ground even at stage of passing of final order under 245D(4)-Limitation-Proceedings were pending from 26-2-2015 till 4-8-2016, said period was to be excluded while calculating limitation period for issuing notice under section 143(3) read with section 153A and after excluding above period, notice issued under said section was not time barred. [S. 132, 153A, 153B, 245C, 245D(4), 245HA]

Rohit Kumar Gupta v. PCIT (2019) 266 Taxman 249 / 310 CTR 393 / 181 DTR 185(Delhi) (HC) RPG Consultants (P) Ltd v. PCIT (2019) 266 Taxman 249/ 310 CTR 393 / 181 DTR 185 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery–Joint savings account with husband-TRO cannot issue notice to bank for marking said bank account for lien towards arrears of tax liability of her husband, without issuing a notice to assessee. [S. 226(3)(iii), Art.226]

Beena Muralidhar (Mrs.) v. TRO (2019) 266 Taxman 219 (Karn.) (HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search Search prior to 1-6-2015-S.153C as amended W.E.F. 1-6-2015 is not applicable-Limitation-Notice issued for the assessment years beyond six assessment years would be beyond jurisdiction- Writ is maintainable. [S. 132, 153A, 153B, Art. 226]

Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal v. CIT (2019) 418 ITR 25/ ( 2020) 186 DTR 273 / 313 CTR 520(Guj.) (HC).Editorial . ITO v. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia (2023)453 ITR 417/ 293 Taxman 4/ 332 CTR 1/ 224 DTR 217 (SC), order of High court reversed/ Reversed ,ACIT v. Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal (2023)454 ITR 531 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Transfer of leasehold rights- Allegation that the transaction is not genuine–No new material-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 56, 148]

Integra Garments And Textiles Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 418 ITR 139 / 310 CTR 570/ 175 DTR 241 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Export business-No new material-Notice under direction of Commissioner-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 80HHC, 148]

CIT v. Narcissus Investments P. Ltd. (2019) 417 ITR 512/182 DTR 73/ (2020) 314 CTR 833 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–With in four years-Report of investigation wing showing over valuation of shares–Original assessment u/s. 143(1)–Notice on the ground of over valuation shares is held to be valid. [S. 143(1), 143(3), 148]

Chetan Sabharwal. v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 8 / 310 CTR 690/181 DTR 313 (Delhi)(HC) Nitn Sabharwal v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 8 / 310 CTR 690/181 DTR 313 ( Delhi ) (HC)