This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 153A : Assessment–Search-Addition to income on account of receipt of share application money and premium-AO not referring to any seized material or other material found during course of search-Addition is unsustainable.
Dy. CIT v. Madhyam Housing Pvt. Ltd. (2019)76 ITR 82 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 153 : Assessment-Limitation-Capital gains-Reference to valuation officer–No extension of time for assessment as in case of reference under S. 142A-Assessment order to be passed on or before 31.03.2016 whereas the same was passed on 19.05.2016-Order barred by limitation. [S. 45, 50C, 55A, 142A]
Naina Saluja v. DCIT (2019) 76 ITR 135 (Luck.)(Trib.)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Approving authorities giving approval in mechanical manner-Reassessment invalid-Department failing to bring on record any evidence of income earned by assessee-Entire amount of doubtful transactions added as assessee’s additional income-Impermissible. [S. 147, 148]
Mukesh Chand Garg v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 344 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment–Information obtained from the sales tax department–No independent enquiry or application of mind-Reassessment invalid-Assessment–Notice-Issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) is mandatory – Failure renders the reassessment invalid [S. 69C, 143(2), 148]
Hari Steels and General Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 75 ITR 90/ 104 Taxmann.com 293 ( Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Income from other sources–Reassessment proceedings initiated on suspicion-when nothing incriminating was found to suggest that anything over and above Re. 1 per share was paid by assessee-Reassessment is held to be invalid. [S.56(2)(viia), 148]
Priya Tools (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 249 / 201 TTJ 505 / 73 ITR 546 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment–Reassessment proceedings initiated without any application of mind and examination of information received from investigation wing amounts to borrowed satisfaction–Notice is quashed. [S. 148]
Lakshya Ice & Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 73 ITR 95 / 201 TTJ 211 / 56 CCH 281 / 181 DTR 153 (Agra)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment–Legal representatives-Notice issued in name of deceased assessee-No subsequent notice issued on legal heirs of deceased assessee-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 148, 159]
Bhura Ram (Late) v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 681 (2020) 206 TTJ 29 (UO ) (Jaipur)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Jurisdiction of authorities-No specific order passed by principal CIT under section 120(4)(B) authorising Joint Commissioner to act as an AO-Reassessment Order passed by Joint Commissioner liable to be quashed. [S. 2(7A), 120(4)(b), 148]
Kishore Vithaldas v. JCIT (2019) 76 ITR 623 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-AO should record ‘reason to believe’ that certain income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment–This belief should be based on independent enquires/application of mind and not on borrowed satisfaction ie basis information from Investigation Wing- Sanction-Sanction granted by the CIT under S. 151 by simply writing “Yes, I am satisfied” is also invalid. [S. 147, 148]
Vinod Commodities v. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 49 / 200 TTJ 273 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years–No scrutiny assessment–Reopening solely based on information from Investigation Wing–No independent application of mind– Reassessment is held to be invalid. [S. 148]
Magan Behari Lal v. DCIT (2019) 75 ITR 322 (Delhi)(Trib.)