This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 57 : Income from other sources-Deductions–Interest from bank-Bank charges-Failure to establish directly related to earning of interest income from banks. [S. 56, 57(iii)]

Dinesh H. Valecha v. DCIT (2019) 178 ITD 701 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources–Gift- Difference in valuation in fair market value of property and value adopted by the AO is less than 1%-deletion of addition is held to be justified. [S. 56(2)(viia)]

DCIT v. Jain Housing (2019) 178 ITD 814 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-When an assessee objects for stamp valuation–AO is bound to make reference to DVO for determination of value of property-Matter remanded. [S.45, 50C(2)]

Aavishkar Film (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 613 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Land and building -Right in the lease hold land– Building-Lease hold right assessable under normal provisions of the capital gains-Building being depreciable asset capital gain to be computed as short term u/s.50 of the Act. [S. 2(11), 2(29A), 2(29B), 2(42A), 50]

Hirsh Bracelet India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 601 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Transfer–Conversion-AOP converted in to a company limited by shares-New company never remained in existence simultaneously–Not liable to capital gain tax. [S.2(47)]

ACIT v. Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre. (2019) 178 ITD 362 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Sale of shares-investigation wing report- Shares were dematerialized and sales had been routed from de-mat account and consideration had been received through banking channels- Addition cannot be made as cash credits. [S. 10(38), 68]

Karuna Garg. (Smt.) v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 823 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40A(2) : Expenses or payments not deductible–Excessive or unreasonable–Payment of interest at 15% to HUF-Payment made to related parties-AO has not established that the payment was excessive and unreasonable-Addition is held to be not valid.

Motilal Laxmichand Sanghavi v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 710 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Business came to halt–Dormant-Expenditure in respect of rent, professional charges, audit fees, property tax, etc., was incurred by assessee for purpose of maintaining its legal status and for disposing its assets-Held to be allowable.

Hirsh Bracelet India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 601 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Motor car and telephone expenses–Failure to maintain log book-Ad-hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses is held to be justified.

Motilal Laxmichand Sanghavi v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 710 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va) : Any sum received from employees–Deposited EPF and ESI contribution late but before due date of filing return-Entitle to deduction- Binding precedent-When decision of jurisdictional High Court is available on issue -Non jurisdictional High Court cannot be followed. [S.139(1), Art.227].

Gilco Exports Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 865 / (2020) 204 TTJ 218 (Chd.)(Trib.)