This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 245N : Advance ruling – Transaction includes also proposed transaction -Maintainability of application cannot be raised at the time of hearing of application – Duty of the Authority to look in to all aspects of questions posed for its consideration , proceedings on the presumption that one part of agreement has no bearing on other is held to be not tenable [S. 245S(1), 245R ]

Saudi Arabian Oil Company, In Re (2018) 405 ITR 83/ 303 CTR 225/ 167 DTR 185 (AAR)

S.148: Reassessment – Notice -Concurrent jurisdiction of Assessing Officer Area -Delay and laches on part of assessee in responding notices lost his right to question jurisdiction of Assessing Officer [ S.120(1), 124(3) , 147 ]

Abhishek Jain v. ITO (2018) 405 ITR 1 / 168 DTR 121/ 303 CTR 753 (Delhi) (HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Transaction disclosed in original assessment proceedings discovered to be bogus, reassessment is held to be valid [ S.148 ]

New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT ( 2017) 298 CTR 230 //156 DTR 217 /84 taxmann.com 136 /(2018) 405 ITR 132 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Transfer of pending proceedings on request by assessee, provisions cannot be invoked . [ S. 120, 124]

Abhishek Jain v. ITO (2018) 405 ITR 1/ 168 DTR 121 / 303 CTR 753(Delhi) (HC)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects- Date of commencement – Merely securing approval of Local Authority is not step towards development, actual date of construction is relevant . Project completed in year 2001 therefore balconies to be excluded [ S.80IB(10)(c ).

CIT v. Padmini Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. (2018) 405 ITR 27 (Delhi) (HC)

S.40(a)(ia):Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – No contract between assessee and parties of hired Vehicles on freight basis for transportation on behalf of principal — Not liable to deduct tax at source [S.194C ]

CIT v. Shark Roadways Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 405 ITR 78 (All) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Accrued or contingent Liability — Enhanced Licence fee payable to Railways is held to be allowable as deduction .[ S.36 , 145 ]

CIT v. Jagdish Prasad Gupta. (2018) 405 ITR 29 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Permanent establishment – Main business and revenue earning activities of assessee carried on in and from Saudi Arabia, and monitored by Saudi Arabian Ministry – Services carried on by Indian Company in nature of support services only and not constituting main business of Non-Resident – Non-Resident retaining with itself authority to finalise marketing strategies and terms of contracts directly with customers — Indian Company cannot be held to be a Permanent Establishment of Non-Resident- DTAA-India -Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [ Art, 5 , 12 ]

Saudi Arabian Oil Company, In Re (2018) 405 ITR 83/ 303 CTR 225/167 DTR 185 (AAR)

S.253: Appellate Tribunal – Tax Effect – Below 10 lakhs – Where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets/ bank accounts – Exception to circular – Appeal by revenue is maintainable

DCIT v. Rahul Rajnikant Parikh & Ors (Mum.) (Trib.), www.itatonline.org

S.5 : Scope of total income – Non-resident foreign national – Alleged deposits in HSBC Foreign Bank account at GENEVA – Deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) is held to be not justified – AO is directed to make further investigation to find out whether the source of the deposits in foreign account originated from India. [S.5(2), 6, 9]

DCIT v. Rahul Rajnikant Parikh & Ors (Mum.) (Trib.), www.itatonline.org