S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice issued in name of legal heirs–Held to be valid. [S. 147]
S.M. Sarveswaran (HUF) v. ITO (2019) 267 Taxman 542 / (2020) 195 DTR 46(Mad.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice issued in name of legal heirs–Held to be valid. [S. 147]
S.M. Sarveswaran (HUF) v. ITO (2019) 267 Taxman 542 / (2020) 195 DTR 46(Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment–With in four years-Failure to disclose material facts-Fails to challenge the reopening at the appropriate time before the Court-Not entitled to seek such indulgence, after allowing the Officer to pass the order of assessment-Writ Court cannot sit as an Appellate Authority and decide the merits of the assessment-Writ is held to be not maintainable. [S. 148, Art.226]
Doosan Bobcat India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 184 DTR 393 / (2020) 312 CTR 257 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Business expenditure-Technical know how-Depreciation-TP adjustments were made in the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 32(1)(ii), 37(1)]
CIT v. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. (2019) 267 Taxman 200 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment—Change of opinion-Original return processed by intimation No failure to disclose truly and fully all material and no new tangible material available with AO Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 143(1), 143(3), 148]
Tenzing Match Works v. Dy. CIT (2019) 419 ITR 338 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains-Year of taxability-Transfer of land under Development agreement-Amounts received offered to tax as capital gains and assessed for AY. 1999-2000 up to 2003-04-No adjudication regarding date of effective transfer of land- Reassessment is valid–Tribunal while granting the relief ought to have granted consequential reliefs-AO is directed to give relief for AY.1999-2000 to 2003-04. [S.45, 148, 154, 254(1)]
C. Venkatachalam (HUF) v. ACIT (2019)419 ITR 204 / (2020) 196 DTR 352 /317 CTR 908 (Mad.) (HC) C. Sudarsana Srinivasan (HUF) v. ACIT (2019) 419 ITR 204 / (2020) 196 DTR 352/ 317 CTR 908(Mad.) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Bogus transactions-Accommodation entries-bogus long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Report by investigation wing–Search of third person-Reasons can be explained further in affidavit-Reasons Can Be Explained Further In Affidavit—Notice of reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 45, 148, 153A(1)(b), Art. 226]
Purnima Komalkant Sharma v. Dy. CIT (2019)419 ITR 361 (Guj.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Report of Investigation wing of Income-Tax Department-AO analysing report and forming belief that income had escaped assessment-Reassessment notice is valid. [S.148, Art. 226]
Hemjay Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Through Deenaben Yogeshbhai Shah v. ITO (2019)419 ITR 39 /311 CTR 413/ 183 DTR 113(Guj.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment–Based on facts of later assessment year– Tangible material-Reassessment is held to be valid-Income derived from installation and maintenance of Atm Machines—Not entitled to deduction u/s. 80IA. [S. 80IA, 143(1), 143(3), 148]
Diebold Systems Private Limited v. ITO (OSD) (2019) 419 ITR 333 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains–Cash sales-Failure to disclose material facts – Notice of reassessment is held to be valid. [S. 45, 48 148, Art.226 ]
J.P. Iscon Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 267 Taxman 481 / 111 taxmann.com 260 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the assessee, J.P. Iscon Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 267 Taxman 480 (SC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Non disposal of assesses objections-Direction u/s 144A-Assessment without disposing the objection is held to be bad in law-AO is directed to pass the reasoned order after considering the objection. [ S. 144A, 148, Art. 226]
Swadesh Trading Co. v. DCIT (2019) 182 DTR 81 / 310 CTR 810 (Karn.)(HC) Swadesh Trading Co. v. D CIT (2019) 182 ITR 85 / 310 CTR 814 (Karn.)(HC)