S. 68 : Cash credit-Impounding of documents found during search-Satisfactory explanation is furnished–Addition cannot be made. [S. 132, 153A]
Dy. CIT v. Pumarth Commodities P. Ltd. (2019) 69 ITR 52 (SN) (Indore)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credit-Impounding of documents found during search-Satisfactory explanation is furnished–Addition cannot be made. [S. 132, 153A]
Dy. CIT v. Pumarth Commodities P. Ltd. (2019) 69 ITR 52 (SN) (Indore)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Bank deposits-Funds withdrawn from bank four months ago for purchase of a property but due to non-materialised of property transaction, money was re-deposited in bank account, addition cannot be as cash credits.
Baljit Singh. V. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 12 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources–Shares issued at premium-DCF method-Commercial expediency has to be seen from point of view of businessman – Addition is held to be not justified. [R. 11UA(2)]
Cinestaan Entertainment (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 180 DTR 65 / 200 TTJ 459 ( Delhi)(Trib.) Editorial : Affirmed in PCIT v. Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 433 ITR 82/ 199 DTR 345/ 320 CTR 381 (Delhi) (HC)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Interest income–Bank deposits-Assessable as income from other sources and not as income from business [S. 28(i)]
Global Entropolis (Vizag)(P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 178 ITD 179/ 202 TTJ 384/ 183 DTR 297 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Share Premium-Share application money received from non-residents-Provisions of S.56(2)(viib) is not applicable – Additions cannot be made as cash credits. [S. 56(2)(viib), 68]
Edulink (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 178 ITD 174 (Bang.)(Trib. )S. 56 : Income from other sources-Bonus shares-Provisions of S. 56(2)(vii)(c) would not apply to bonus shares. [S. 56(2)(vii)(c)]
DCIT v. Mamta Bhandari. (Smt.) (2019) 178 ITD 89 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources – Capital or revenue-Amount received for relinquishing secretaryship of educational society cannot be treated as a capital receipt-Assessable as income from other sources. [S. 4, 45]
H. S. Ramchandra Rao v. CIT ( 2019) 419 ITR 480/ 311 CTR 945 / 184 DTR 305/( 2020) 269 Taxman 372 SC) www.itatonline.org Editorial : Order in CIT v. Ramachandra Rao (2011) 330 ITR 322 (Karn.) (HC) is affirmed)S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence–Short term–Long term-Date of acquisition-Date of allotment letter and not conveyance deed-Entitle to exemption. [S.2(29A), 2(29B), 2(42A), 2(42B), 45, 54F]
Bhawna Sharma (Smt.) v. DY. CIT (IT) (2019) 75 ITR 7 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Purchase of property-Applicable to seller and not purchaser-Unaccounted income invested in the purchase of property.[S. 56(2)(x), 132, 153C]
Dy.CIT v. Sutlej Agro Products Ltd. (2019) 70 ITR 33 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation–Lease hold rights–Stamp valuation is not applicable-Addition is held to be not valid. [S. 45]
Ara properties P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2019)75 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol.) Trib)