This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court–Sale of shares-Income earned from sale of shares held for more than one year–Held as long-term capital gain- Applicability Explanation to S. 73 cannot be raised for first time in proceedings pending before High Court. [S. 45, 73]

PCIT v. Envision Investment & Finance (P.) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 242 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal- Powers-Dismissal of appeal-Non appearance -Failure to appear on the appointed date, failure to make arrangement to represent her before Tribunal by an authorised representative and also failed to sought for another date of hearing- Dismissal of appeal by the Tribunal is held to be justified.

Shobha Lakshman (Smt.) v. CIT (2019) 264 Taxman 198/ 311 CTR 496 / 183 DTR 213(Karn.)(HC)/ Editorial: Shobha Lakshman (Smt) v. CIT (Appeals) (2023) 295 Taxman 237 (SC), matter is restored to the file of the CIT(A)).

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Application–Cross examination- Relying upon statements of witness without giving an opportunity of cross examination the application of the assessee was rejected by the Settlement Commission-High Court rejected the writ petition. [S. 245C]

Amrapali Fincap Ltd. v. ITSC (2016) 73 taxmann.com 97 (Guj.) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the assessee, Amrapali Fincap Ltd. v. ITSC (2019) 264 Taxman 84 (SC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases–Settlement Commission either reject the application or it could have directed Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to enquire and submit report so as to enable to Commission to take a decision- Settlement Commission could not relegate matter to Assessing Officer to dispose of assessee’s case on merits. [S. 245(2C), 245D(1), 245D(4)]

Samdariya Builders (P.) Ltd. v. ITSC (2019) 264 Taxman 176 / 311 CTR 500/ 183 DTR 209 //(2020)423 ITR 203 (MP)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default- Wilful evasion of payment of tax- waiver of interest is rejected [ S. 158BC, 220(2A)]

Mansukhlal Pitalia v. PCIT (2019) 264 Taxman 217/ 181 DTR 248/ 310 CTR 474 (MP)(HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Deputation-Contract between assessee manpower provider and Kuwait based company-Employee was deputed in Kuwaiti company who was under employment of assessee-assessee was not required to deduct tax at source.[ S.9(1) (vii), 40(a) (ia) ]

PCIT v. Supriya Suhas Joshi (Smt.) (2019) 106 taxmann.com 57/ 264 Taxman 25 (Mag.)/ 182 DTR 109 / (2020) 313 CTR 482(Bom.) (HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalties and fee for technical services-Banking services-Foreign bank-Rendering financial services in order to raise capital abroad through issuance of Global Depository Receipts (‘GDRs’)- Not liable to tax in India as fee for technical services- Not liable to deduct tax at source–Article 12 of OECD Model Convention.[S. 9(1) (i),9(1)(vii)]

CIT (IT) v. Indusind Bank Ltd. (2019) 415 ITR 115 / 264 Taxman 190/179 DTR 18/ 311 CTR 858 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors-Composite sales invoice–Matter remanded. [S. 40(a)(ia), 194C(iv)]

Kramski Stamping & Molding India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 106 taxmann.com 247/ 264 Taxman 26 (Mag.)/(2020) 180 DTR 225/ 313 CTR 345 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits – Share capital- Mauritius based company-Supplied certificate of foreign inward remittance of funds, tax residence certificate of foreign company, copy of ledger account showing share application money being credited in bank account and source – Merely on the basis of information from investigation Wing,reassessment is bad in law. [S. 68]

NuPower Renewables (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 104 taxmann.com 307 / 264 Taxman 27 (Mag.) / 182 DTR 344/ 311 CTR 398(Bom.)(HC).Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed , ACIT v NuPower Renewables (P.) Ltd ( 2019) 267 Taxman 393 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Possession of cash amount- All documents were made available at time of original assessment- Reassessment merely on basis of change of opinion was held to be not justified. The fact that the assessee did not disclose the material is not relevant if the AO was otherwise aware of it[S. 69A, 133A, 148],153A

Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit v. DCIT (2019) 416 ITR 89/ 264 Taxman 222 / 180 DTR 153 (Bom.)(HC) www.itatonline.org