This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Interest paid on purchase of securities-expenditure for increase in capital–loss on securities-Excess claim of depreciation-There was no failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all relevant material- Reassessment is bad in law.[S. 32, 36(1), 148]
CIT v. City Union Bank Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 204 /( 2020) 312 CTR 453/ 185 DTR 294(Mad)(HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Arm’s length price-Only one comparable-Difference in functionality- Matter remanded.
Pyramid IT Consulting (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 264 Taxman 23 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing–Arm’s length price–Export of finished valves and valves in kit form to its AE and also to its group companies across globe -TPO ought to have arrived at ALP of assessee’s sale to its AE by only comparing it with uncontrolled transaction of sale. [S. 92]
PCIT v. Audco India Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 237/ (2024) 461 ITR 152 (Bom.)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. L and T Valves Ltd ( 2023) 295 Taxman 585 /2024) 461 ITR 157( SC)
S. 80IB : Industrial undertakings-Profit from sale of slag, which was a by-product in manufacture of pig iron, was to be considered as profit from business of industrial undertaking engaged in manufacture and sale of pig iron for purpose of deduction.
Sesa Industries Ltd. v. CIT (2019) 415 ITR 257 / 264 Taxman 95/ 180 DTR 25/ 309 CTR 380 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 72 : Carry forward and set off of business losses–Return was not filed with in prescribed time–Application for condonation of delay was not filed with in permissible time limit – Rejection of application is held to be justified. [S. 119, 139(1), 254(1)]
Ganesh Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Government of India (2019) 264 Taxman 150 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure–Hawala transaction-Bogus purchases–Trading in paper and paper products-Adoption of profit at 12.5 % of alleged bogus purchases is held to be justified. [S. 143(3)]
Pooja Paper Trading Co (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 264 Taxman 260 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 54B : Capital gains – Land used for agricultural purposes– Denial of exemption on the basis of report of inspector and statement of bataidar is held to be justified. [S. 45]
Rajiv Dass v. DCIT (2019) 414 ITR 37 / 103 taxmann.com 192 / 264 Taxman 40 (Mag.) (Delhi) (HC)
S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment–Provision for Licence fee -Mercantile system of accounting-S.43B(1)(g) inserted with effect from 1-4-2017 will accordingly apply to assessment year 2017-18 and subsequent assessment years. [S. 43B(1)(g), 145]
CIT v. Jagdish Prasad Gupta. (2019) 414 ITR 396 / 264 Taxman 231/ 178 DTR 403 / 311 CTR 72 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 43(1) : Actual cost–Subsidy-Setting up new industry- Calculation of subsidy on the basis of sales tax or excise duty- Amount of subsidy was not to be deducted from actual cost for purpose of calculating depreciation etc. [S. 4, 32]
PCIT v. Welspun Steel Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 252 (Bom.) (HC)