This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath–Addition made on the basis of statement on oath–Subsequent retraction- Statement recorded during the course of action which was in presence of independent witness has overriding effect over the subsequent retraction- Addition is held to be valid. [S. 131, 132, 292C]
Bannalal Jat Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 106 taxmann.com 127 / 264 taxman 6 (Raj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed, Bannalal Jat Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 264 Taxman 5 (SC)
S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Ownership of land-Housing complex was situated on a piece of land which was occupied by Co-operative Housing Society under a long term lease- Exemption cannot be denied in respect of sale of flat in a society. [S. 45]
PCIT v. Rahul Uday Tuljapurkar (2019) 264 Taxman 36/ 180 DTR 132/ 310 CTR 800 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation-Set off of- Benefit of carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation for assessment year 1997-98 is allowed against income of assessment year 2005-06. [S. 32(2)]
PCIT v. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. (2019) 106 taxmann.com 131 / 264 Taxman 20 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 19 (SC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Interest free funds were utilized for making exempt investment-No disallowance can be made.[R. 8D].
PCIT v. Ashok Apparels (P.) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 50/(2020)423 ITR 412 (Bom.) (HC)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Golf facilities to its members for promotion of sport-No element of activity of being in nature of trade, commerce or business-Interest earned from banks or financial institutions on investment of surplus funds arising from charitable activities was exempted from tax. [S. 2(15)]
CIT v. Bombay Presidency Gold Club Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 55/ 182 DTR 454/ 311 CTR 578 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Educational Institution-Res judicata-Denial of exemption is held to be not justified. [S. 10(23C)(vi), 12AA]
CIT v. Takshila Education Society (2019) 264 Taxman 72/ 178 DTR 182 (Patna)(HC)