S. 45 : Capital gains – Income from other sources- Transfer of rights in property – Assessable as capital gains and not as income from other sources [ S. 54EC ,56 ]
Amol C. Shah (HUF) v. ITO (2020)423 ITR 408 / 274 Taxman 519 (Bom)(HC)S. 45 : Capital gains – Income from other sources- Transfer of rights in property – Assessable as capital gains and not as income from other sources [ S. 54EC ,56 ]
Amol C. Shah (HUF) v. ITO (2020)423 ITR 408 / 274 Taxman 519 (Bom)(HC)S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax – Remission or cessation of trading liability – Commission claimed as expenditure – Write off of loan- cannot be treated as revenue receipts .
PCIT v .Rajasthan Co-Operative Dairy Federation Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 89 (Raj) (HC)S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible – Any rate or tax levied – Education cess is held to be deductible . [ S. 246A , 254(1) Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S 10(4) ]
Sesa Goa Ltd. v JCIT (2020)423 ITR 426 /117 taxmann.com 96/ 193 DTR 41/ 316 CTR 446 (Bom) (HC)/Editorial: JCIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 236 / (2024) 460 ITR 4(SC), High Court order is reversedS.37(1): Business expenditure — Advertisement expenses – Failure to prove the genuineness of expenses – Disallowance is held to be justified
Fiitjee Ltd. v PCIT (2020) 423 ITR 354 / 271 Taxman 177 (Delhi)(HC)S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Termination of lease and licence – Deletion of expenditure is held to be justified .
PCIT v. Lee and Muirhead Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 167 (Bom) (HC)S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Capital or revenue- Preliminary expenditure incurred for submission of tender in another Port —Allowable as revenue expenditure .
CIT v .South India Corporation Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 158 (Ker)(HC)S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Capital or revenue – Replacement of damaged parts of existing machinery — Revenue expenditure .
PCIT v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd. (2020) 423 ITR 54 / 192 DTR 233(Guj) (HC )S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Capital or revenue Computer software expenses — Legal expenses incurred in connection with sale of capital assets – Held to be revenue expenditure .
PCIT v. Aker Powergas Pvt. Ltd. (2020)423 ITR 536 (Bom)(HC)S. 36(1)(viia) :Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts – Co-Operative Bank — Deduction for 10 Per Cent. of aggregate advances of Rural Branches – Not allowable .
Ernakulam District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v CIT (2020) 423 ITR 308 (Ker)(HC)S.36(1)(vii): Bad Debts —Lottery and financing business- Advance of money- Amounts written off in accounts — Held to be allowable . [ S.36 (1), 36(2) ]
Deccan Agency v. Dy CIT (2020) 423 ITR 418 (Mad) (HC)