This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest bearing loans–Charged interest at 9% – Disallowance of interest at 12% is held to be not justified. [S. 36(1)(iii)]

Alkoplus Producers (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 177 ITD 150 / 71 ITR 650/ 181 DTR 329/ 201 TTJ 893 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission-ad hoc disallowance of 50% – Furnished details of payment-Ad-hoc disallowance is held to be not justified.

Alkoplus Producers (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 177 ITD 150 / 71 ITR 650/181 DTR 329 /201 TTJ 893 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Illegal payments-Fee paid for registration of product in Iraq- Cannot be said to be payment of kickbacks to Iraqi regime for doing business-Allowable as deduction.

DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 26 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free loan to subsidiary from interest bearing funds- Proportionate interest payment is disallowable.

DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 26 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital–Provision for interest liability–Held to be allowable as deduction-Rule of consistency- It is not open to revenue to accept a judgment in the case of one assessee, and appeal, against the identical judgment in the case of another. It was held that such a differential treatment on the same set of facts was not permissible in law. [S. 43B]

DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 26 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Investment depreciation reserve-co-operative society-Bound by the Reserve Bank of India directives-Business of banking-Matter remanded.

Ahmedabad District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 70 ITR 428 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 28(i) : Business income-trading in shares-Professionally managed Portfolio Management Services (PMS)-large number of scrips were traded and period of holding at times was as short as few days- Assessable as business income and not capital gains. [S. 2(13), 2(14), 45]

Tash Investment (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 177 ITD 210/ 181 DTR 109 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Maintenance charges from tenants were not received-Addition is deleted. [S. 23]

ACIT v. Akshay Sobti. (2019) 177 ITD 92 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income– Disallowance cannot exceed in excess of actual expenditure. [R. 8D]

Tash Investment (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 177 ITD 210 /181 DTR 109(Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Investment in tax free bonds – No nexus between interest bearing funds and investment made in tax free bonds- Exemption cannot be denied. [S. 10(15)(iv)]

Standard Chartered Bank v. JCIT (2019) 177 ITD 139 / 200 TTJ 774T 178 DTR 201(Mum) (Trib.)