This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Cash credits- Share capital- AO had made enquiry by seeking information from Switzerland Tax Authorities through proper channel of FT & TR division of CBDT, for exchange of information so as to verify identity, source of funds and creditworthiness of holding company and its promoters- Revision is held to be not justified. [S. 68]

Bycell Telecommunications India (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT, (2018) 193 TTJ 565 / 90 taxmann.com 268/( 2019) 174 DTR 97 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Additional ground–validity of the assessment can be challenged at any time as it goes to the root of the matter and is a legal issue.

Cyient Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 194 TTJ 69 / 167 DTR 281(Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal—Duties-Additional ground- Validity of assessment is legal in nature–Admitted. [S. 153C]

BNB Investment and Properties Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi) (Trib.) Ranjan Gupta v. Dy.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Limitation-Delay of 285 days-No material prove bona fides attempts made in filing appeal, mere self-serving documents cannot condoned the huge delay-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 246A]

Astec Lifesciences Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 67 ITR 485 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Non filing of appeal in electronic form-Appeal cannot be dismissed on Technical grounds during changeover period.

Asterix Reinforced Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 64 ITR 79 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 221 : Penalty—Failure to pay self-assessment tax—amendment prescribing mandatory charge of interest—Amendment does not envisage penalty for non-payment of self-assessment tax. [S.140A(3), 221(1)]

Balraj Prakashchand Bansal v. Dy. CIT (2018) 64 ITR 62 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and Seizure—Issue of notice is mandatory-The amendment in S.153C by the Finance Act, 2017, with effect from April 1, 2017 to the effect that the block period for the person in respect of whom the search was conducted as well as the “other person” would be the same six assessment years immediately preceding the year of search was prospective in nature-Order is held to be bad in law. [S.132, 153B(1)(b)]

BNB Investment and Properties Ltd. v. DY.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi) (Trib.) Ranjan Gupta v. DY.CIT (2018) 68 ITR 567 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure—Satisfaction note is not available-Assessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 153A]

Avalanche Reality P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 68 ITR 79 (SN) (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Deposit in bank–Merely on the basis of deposit made in bank, reassessment is not valid when there is contradiction between statement recorded and information of recording reasons. [S. 148]

Inder Jeet v. ITO (2018) 68 ITR 71 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.) Ashok Kumar v. ITO (2018) 68 ITR 71 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment–Assessment of amalgamating company-Notices were issued prior to the amalgamation with another company–Assessment proceedings cannot be held to be invalid. [S.142(1), 143(2)]

Cyient Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 194 TTJ 69 / 167 DTR 281(Hyd.)(Trib.)