This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Charitable purpose-Activities of relating to providing services of relief to poor, education and medical relief would fall within scope of general public utility-Entitle to exemption. [S.2(15,) 12, 12A, 80G]

CIT v. Praxis Institute For Participatory Practices. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 148/ 269 Taxman 39 (Delhi) (HC) CIT v. Praxis Institute For Participatory Practices. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 147/ 269 Taxman 39 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue; CIT v. Praxis Institute For Participatory Practices. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 149/ 269 Taxman 38 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Deletion of penalty on the basis of order of sister concern is held to be justified-No question of law. [S. 260A].

PCIT v. Synbiotics Ltd. (2019) 112 taxmann.com 399 / (2020) 269 Taxman 51 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed; PCIT v. Synbiotics Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 50 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty- Concealment-Capital gains on sale of land-Revised return prior to issue of notice u/s 153C-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 45, 139(3), 153C ]

PCIT v. Prabhjot Kaur Chhabra. (2020)113 taxmann.com 140 / 269 Taxman 35 (MP) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed ; PCIT v. Prabhjot Kaur Chhabra. (2020) 269 Taxman 34 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Depreciation-Claim was withdrawn in the course of search proceedings-Deletion of penalty by the Tribunal is held to be justified. [S. 32, 132(4), 153A]

PCIT v. Financial Technologies India Ltd. (2019) 112 taxmann.com 398 / (2020) 269 Taxman 33 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed ; PCIT v. Financial Technologies India Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 32 (SC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Rejection of application on the ground that availability of remedy of appeal-Commissioner is directed to decide the application on its merits. [Art. 226]

Hirdey Ram v. CIT (2020) 421 ITR 4 (P&H) (HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Use of electronic clearing system through bank account-Deposit of cash directly in beneficiary’s bank account beyond prescribed limit-Transaction not through clearing house of electronic mode-Business expediency is not established-Disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 40A(3), R.6DD, Art. 226]

Ajai Kumar Singh Khaldelial v. CIT (2020) 421 ITR 6/186 DTR 57 / 312 CTR 473/(2021) 277 Taxman 91 (All.)(HC)

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Order of Tribunal granted the stay is affirmed-Appeal is held to be misconceived. [S.253, 260A]

CIT v. MSD Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 136 / 269 Taxman 49 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed; CIT v. MSD Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 48 (SC)

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Non-resident-Deduction of tax at source-It was obligation of payer to deduct entire tax at source and, assessee was not liable to pay any advance tax-Interest cannot be charged.

CIT(IT) v. Andritz AG. (2020)113 taxmann.com 407 / 269 Taxman 206 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue; CIT (IT) v. Andritz AG. (2020) 269 taxman 205 (SC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default- Stay-Existence of prima facie case, financial stringency and balance of convenience-Duty of PCIT and responsibility of assesse-Status quo to be maintained till disposal of stay petitions by PCIT. [S. 220(3), 220(6), Art.226]

Jayanthi Seeman v. CIT (2020) 421 ITR 320 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default- Stay-Stay was granted subject to depositing 15% of outstanding demand.

Karmvir Builders v. PCIT (2020) 113 taxmann.com 138 / 269 Taxman 46 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed Karmvir Builders v. PCIT (2020) 269 Taxman 45 (SC)