This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271AAA : Penalty-If no search has taken place in premises of assessee – All conditions laid down fulfilled–Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 132, 153C]

DCIT v. Jainco Developers Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 64 ITR 458 / 52 CCH 575 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Preferring incorrect claim by itself will not tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and therefore penalty under S.271(1)(c) of the Act, cannot be imposed on the same.

Dy. CIT v. MCML Train Control Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 63 ITR 144 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 198 : Deduction at source-Tax deducted is income received–Mismatch of receipts- Balance sheet item-Service tax wrongly treated as TDS by AO cannot be considered as income. [Form 26AS]

DCIT v. G.E. Capital Business Process Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (2017) 51 CCH 158(2018) 63 ITR 337 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Payment made to foreign entities for supply of equipment-where no income accrued in India – Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S.5, 9(1)(i), 194C]

DCIT v. Joint Secretary Organizing Committee for Winter Games, 2009 (2018) 196 TTJ 975 / 54 CCH 84 /68 ITR 14 ( SN)/ (2019) 173 DTR 122 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors–Sub-Contractor- Contractor has to deduct tax at source on payment made to their sub contractors – Where person fails to deduct tax at source on sum paid to resident or on sum credited to account of resident such person shall not be deemed to be assessee in default in respect of such tax if such resident has furnished his return of income u/s. 139. [S. 40(a)(ia), 139, 201]

DCIT v Joint Secretary Organizing Committee for Winter Games, 2009 (2018) 196 TTJ 975 / 54 CCH 84 / 68 ITR 14 (SN)(2019) 173 DTR 122 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition–If assessee has neither filed return in response to notice nor participated in the assessment proceedings, addition made on the same shall not be deleted-Matter remanded to CIT (A).

DCIT v. Ketan V. Shah (2017) 51 CCH 318 / (2018) 163 DTR 275 / 191 TTJ 35 (Mum.) (Trib.) DCIT v. Ketan V. Shah (HUF) (2017) 51 CCH 318 / (2018) 163 DTR 275 / 191 TTJ 35 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment—Change of opinion – When the initiation of reassessment proceedings amounted to change of opinion, same is not permitted in the law. [S. 40(a)(ia), 43B]

DCIT v. Jasminder Singh (2018) 52 CCH 645/ 63 ITR 53 (SN)) (Luck)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Amalgamation-AO issued notice for reopening only against amalgamating company and not against assessee company which was amalgamated/successor company, assessment made in name of assessee company was void. [S. 148, 292B]

Dy.CIT v. Mani Square Ltd. (2017) 190 TTJ 742 / (2018) 163 DTR 34 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of Accounting – Percentage completion method – Accepted by department in earlier year, then there is no reason for AO to deviate from that method.

Dy.CIT v.Libra Techon Ltd. (2018) 195 TTJ 105 (UO) / 53 CCH 472 /67 ITR 14 (SN)(Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-In terms of sub-section (1) of section 144C, issuance of draft assessment order is a sine qua non before Assessing Officer can pass a regular assessment order under section 143(3). [S. 143(3), 292B]

DCIT v. Jaipur Rugs Co. P. Ltd. (2018) 193 TTJ 49 (UO) / 64 ITR 128 (Jaipur)(Trib.)