S. 80JJA : Bio-degradable waste – Collecting and processing – Deduction allowed for four consecutive years —Deduction cannot be denied for fifth year.
CIT v. Maps Enzymes Ltd. (2020)422 ITR 554/ 193 DTR 318/ 317 CTR 230 (Guj)(HC)S. 80JJA : Bio-degradable waste – Collecting and processing – Deduction allowed for four consecutive years —Deduction cannot be denied for fifth year.
CIT v. Maps Enzymes Ltd. (2020)422 ITR 554/ 193 DTR 318/ 317 CTR 230 (Guj)(HC)S. 80IA :Industrial undertakings – Production of power —Energy – Power would Include steam – Steam produced can be termed as power and would qualify for the benefits . [ S.80IA(4) ]
PCIT v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd. (2020)422 ITR 449 / 107 CCH 0459/ 275 Taxman 78 (Guj) (HC)S.68: Cash credits — Unexplained money — Estimation of gross profit – Day to day stock register is maintained – Deletion of addition is held to be justified . [ S.153A ]
PCIT v. Omprakash Dhanwani (2018) 103 CCH 0493 /(2020) 422 ITR 315 (MP)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits – Affidavit filed by the asesssee was not rebutted -Arbitrary rejection of explanation is not proper – Duty Assessing Officer to conduct proper enquiry-Matter remanded
Adhithiya Gears P. Ltd. v .ACIT (2019) 106 CCH 0435 /(2020)422 ITR 218/ 275 Taxman 350 (Mad)(HC)S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Payment to truck owners towards freight charges – Commission agent – Form 15I was collected within time -Deletion of disallowance is held to be justified .[ S.194C ]
PCIT v. Dilipkumar Bapusaheb Patole (2020)422 ITR 426 / 107 CCH 0456 / 275 Taxman 449 Guj)(HC)S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source -Recipient has declared the income – No loss to revenue – No disallowances can be made – Amendment with effect from 1-4-2013 is declarative and curative in nature . [ S.271C ]
CIT v. S. M. Anand (2019) 105 CCH 0508/(2020)422 ITR 209 (Karn)(HC)S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source -Non-resident -Interest on foreign currency Loan —Specific exemption from Ministry of Finance for interest —Not liable to deduct tax at source – No disallowances can be made .[ S.10(15)(iv)(f),37(1), 195 ]
CIT v. Seven Seas Distillery (Pvt.) Ltd. (2020)422 ITR 229 / 185 DTR 105/ 312 CTR 272/ 271 Taxman 188 (Mad) (HC)S.37(1) : Business expenditure — Wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business – Donations made under Corporate Social Responsibility — Held to be deductible — Res Judicata — Not strictly applicable in Income-Tax proceedings — Consistency essential.
PCIT v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd. (2019) 105 CCH 0504 / (2020) 422 ITR 164/ 192 DTR 233/ 316 CTR 722 (Guj) (HC)/Editorial : SLP is granted to the Revenue , PCIT v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 400 (SC)S. 36(1)(viia) :Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts – Schedule bank – Entitled to deduction to the extent provision is made in the accounts subject to the limit mentioned in S.36(1)(viia) of the Act .
CIT . v Syndicate Bank (2020) 422 ITR 460 /107 CCH 0450 / 188 DTR 272 / 274 Taxman 522(Karn)(HC)S.36(1) (iii): Interest on borrowed capital — Amount borrowed advanced at lower interest — Revenue authorities cannot substitute their own wisdom or notion about the rate of interest agreed to between the parties – Interest is deductible .
CIT v. Shriram Investments (2019) 104 CCH 0737 /(2020)422 ITR 528 (Mad) (HC)