This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

Interpretation of taxing statutes-Retrospective Operation- Presumption of retrospective application of amendments of Procedural nature.

CIT v. Ram Kishan Dass. (2019) 413 ITR 337 / 307 CTR 777/ 263 Taxman 657 (SC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Capital or revenue-Tribunal Recording Inconsistent findings–Matter remanded to Tribunal for decision afresh. [S. 37(1), 260A]

PCIT v. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. (2019) 413 ITR 447/ 308 CTR 305 / 263 Taxman 443/ 177 DTR 161 (SC)Editorial: Order in CIT v. Ballarpur Industries Ltd ( 2017) 85 taxmann.com 13 ( Bom) (HC) is setaside

S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice–Reasons for reassessment need not be given in notice-Writ is held to be not maintainable–Respondent was directed to furnish the recoded reasons from the receipt of order copy–Petitioner can file objection if any against the recorded reasons with n four weeks from the date of receipt of the reasons. [S.147, Art. 226]

Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. UOI (2019) 413 ITR 370/ 179 DTR 209 / 310 CTR 648 (Mad.)(HC),Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v .UOI (2020) 269 Taxman 120 (Mad) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Mixed question of facts and law- Writ is held to be not maintainable–Time limit for issue of Rs. 1 lakh of is applicable to S.149(1)(b) and not for S,149(1) (a) of the Act—Notice to reassessment issued within six years is not barred by limitation. [S. 148, 149(1)(a), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

T. C. V. Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 413 ITR 319 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-All material facts disclosed in the original assessment proceedings–Reassessment to verify cash intensive transactions is held to be not valid.[S. 148]

Revolution Forever Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 413 ITR 400 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed ITO v. Revolution Forever Marketing Pvt. Ltd ( 2020) 269 Taxman 561( SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-No objection raised-Deemed to have acquiesced to reopening assessment-Existence of alternative statutory remedy- Writ is held to be not maintainable. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Hanon Automotive Systems India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 413 ITR 431 / 263 Taxman 417/ 180 DTR 205/ 311 CTR 901(Mad.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables-Question of fact–Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 260A]

Inteva Products India Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 413 ITR 406 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 35 : Scientific research–Research may be carried on by faculty or students-Research need not produce results-Rejection of application for approval without applying proper guidelines is held to be not valid – Matter remanded. [S. 10(23C), 35(1)(ii)]

Manipal Academy of Higher Education. v. UOI (2019) 413 ITR 412/ 263 Taxman 256 / 179 DTR 177 / 309 CTR 224 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Undertaking-Merger of two firms- Firm which is entitle to exemption merged with another firm which is entitle to exemption-New firm is entitle to exemption. [S. 10B(9), 10B(9A)]

CIT v. Trident Minerals.( 2018) 100 taxman.com 161 / (2019) 413 ITR 461 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue CIT v. Trident Minerals ( 2019) 265 Taxman 556 (SC)

S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Wholly or substantially financed by Government -Receiving grant from Government in excess of 50 Per Cent. of its total receipts-Entitled to benefit of exemption for assessment years prior to amendment-Original assessment u/s 143(1) – Reassessment is held to be proper. [S.10(23C)(iiiab), 143(1), 147, 148]

DIT v. Tata Institute of Social Sciences. (2019) 413 ITR 305 / 177 DTR 417/ 308 CTR 759/ 263 Taxman 387(Bom.)(HC)