Interpretation of taxing statutes-Retrospective Operation- Presumption of retrospective application of amendments of Procedural nature.
CIT v. Ram Kishan Dass. (2019) 413 ITR 337 / 307 CTR 777/ 263 Taxman 657 (SC)Interpretation of taxing statutes-Retrospective Operation- Presumption of retrospective application of amendments of Procedural nature.
CIT v. Ram Kishan Dass. (2019) 413 ITR 337 / 307 CTR 777/ 263 Taxman 657 (SC)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Capital or revenue-Tribunal Recording Inconsistent findings–Matter remanded to Tribunal for decision afresh. [S. 37(1), 260A]
PCIT v. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. (2019) 413 ITR 447/ 308 CTR 305 / 263 Taxman 443/ 177 DTR 161 (SC)Editorial: Order in CIT v. Ballarpur Industries Ltd ( 2017) 85 taxmann.com 13 ( Bom) (HC) is setasideS. 148 : Reassessment–Notice–Reasons for reassessment need not be given in notice-Writ is held to be not maintainable–Respondent was directed to furnish the recoded reasons from the receipt of order copy–Petitioner can file objection if any against the recorded reasons with n four weeks from the date of receipt of the reasons. [S.147, Art. 226]
Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v. UOI (2019) 413 ITR 370/ 179 DTR 209 / 310 CTR 648 (Mad.)(HC),Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. v .UOI (2020) 269 Taxman 120 (Mad) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Mixed question of facts and law- Writ is held to be not maintainable–Time limit for issue of Rs. 1 lakh of is applicable to S.149(1)(b) and not for S,149(1) (a) of the Act—Notice to reassessment issued within six years is not barred by limitation. [S. 148, 149(1)(a), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]
T. C. V. Engineering Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 413 ITR 319 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-All material facts disclosed in the original assessment proceedings–Reassessment to verify cash intensive transactions is held to be not valid.[S. 148]
Revolution Forever Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 413 ITR 400 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed ITO v. Revolution Forever Marketing Pvt. Ltd ( 2020) 269 Taxman 561( SC)S. 147 : Reassessment-No objection raised-Deemed to have acquiesced to reopening assessment-Existence of alternative statutory remedy- Writ is held to be not maintainable. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Hanon Automotive Systems India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 413 ITR 431 / 263 Taxman 417/ 180 DTR 205/ 311 CTR 901(Mad.)(HC)S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables-Question of fact–Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 260A]
Inteva Products India Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 413 ITR 406 (Karn.)(HC)S. 35 : Scientific research–Research may be carried on by faculty or students-Research need not produce results-Rejection of application for approval without applying proper guidelines is held to be not valid – Matter remanded. [S. 10(23C), 35(1)(ii)]
Manipal Academy of Higher Education. v. UOI (2019) 413 ITR 412/ 263 Taxman 256 / 179 DTR 177 / 309 CTR 224 (Delhi)(HC)S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Undertaking-Merger of two firms- Firm which is entitle to exemption merged with another firm which is entitle to exemption-New firm is entitle to exemption. [S. 10B(9), 10B(9A)]
CIT v. Trident Minerals.( 2018) 100 taxman.com 161 / (2019) 413 ITR 461 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue CIT v. Trident Minerals ( 2019) 265 Taxman 556 (SC)S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Wholly or substantially financed by Government -Receiving grant from Government in excess of 50 Per Cent. of its total receipts-Entitled to benefit of exemption for assessment years prior to amendment-Original assessment u/s 143(1) – Reassessment is held to be proper. [S.10(23C)(iiiab), 143(1), 147, 148]
DIT v. Tata Institute of Social Sciences. (2019) 413 ITR 305 / 177 DTR 417/ 308 CTR 759/ 263 Taxman 387(Bom.)(HC)