This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India–Royalty-The insertions of Explanations 5 & 6 to s. 9(1)(vi) by the Finance Act 2015 w.r.e.f. 01.04.1976, even if declaratory and clarificatory of the law, will not apply to the DTAAs. The DTAAs are a bilateral agreement between two Countries and cannot be overridden by a unilateral legislative amendment by one Country–Not liable to deduct tax at source -DTAA- India –Nether lands. [S. 195, Art.]

CIT v. Reliance Infocomm Ltd (2019) 179 DTR 112/ (2020) 314 CTR 551 (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonlin.org

S. 271AAB : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st July, 2012–Levy of penalty is not mandatory – Merely on the basis of surrender the levy of penalty is not justified. As regards cash found in the Couse of search which was not disclosed in the books of account, levy of penalty was confirmed.

Rambhajo’s v. ACIT (2019) 198 TTJ 142 / 175 DTR 161 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal Powers-Stay-Penalty–Concealment– Quantum appeal pending before Tribunal–AO directed not to pass final penalty order – However, penalty proceedings not stayed. [S. 271(1)(c)]

Punjab Institute of Medical Science v. Dy. CIT (2019) 176 DTR 391/ 199 TTJ 271 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal–Powers-Remand with Directions– Consequential enhancement is held to be valid. [R. 8D]

Punjab State Co-Operative Milk Produce Federation Ltd. v ACIT (2019) 197 TTJ 642/ 174 DTR 155 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice–Return filed in response offering lesser income- Assesse cannot raise fresh independent claims having effect of reducing income already declared. [S. 147]

Ratnagiri District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v DCIT (2019) 197 TTJ 649/175 DTR 327 ( Pune) (Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Reasons recorded mentioned incorrect amount – No reason to believe–Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 148]

Ambey Construction Co. v. ACIT (2019) 176 DTR 396 / 198 TTJ 969 / 71 ITR 422 (Asr.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–After the expiry of four years–No additions sustained on the reasons recorded–Reassessment is bad in law . [S. 148]

Ratnagiri District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 197 TTJ / 175 DTR 327 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Project Completion Method-Percentage Completion Method-Project completion method is held to be valid- Deletion of addition in respect of advance received from customers is held to be valid. [S. 145(3)]

ITO v. Shanti Constructions (Agra)(Trib.), www.itatonline.org

S. 143(3) : Assessment–Amalgamation–Merger -Assessment order passed in the name of non-existent entity–Held to be invalid. [S. 143(2)]

Dy. CIT v. First Future Agri & Developers Ltd. (2019) 176 DTR 151 / 198 TTJ 1014 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Bank statement cannot be considered as books maintained by assessee-Addition is held to be not valid.

Satish Kumar v. ITO (2019) 198 TTJ 114 / 175 DTR 121 (Asr.)(Trib.)