This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Fixed place of business-liable to be assessed in India- DTAA-India-UK. [Art. 5(1), 5(2), 5(4)]

Rolls Royce Plc v. Dy.CIT (2020) 185 DTR 113 / 312 CTR 158 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income–Quantum appeal is pending–Petition to quash the proceedings before the magistrate court is dismissed. [S. 139(1), Art. 226, 227]

Good Home Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2019) 184 DTR 362 (2020) 312 CTR 102 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Substantial question of law on jurisdictional issue is framed at the time of final hearing of appeal and the order of Assessing Officer is quashed for not issuing the mandatory notice u/s.143(2) of the Act. [S. 158BB, 158C, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)]

CIT v. Fomento Fianance & Investment (P) Ltd. (2019) 183 DTR 340 / (2020) 312 CTR 88 / 421 ITR 146 / 272 Taxman 171 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-AO cannot deviate the mandate of the S.245–Adjustment of refund is held to be bad in law-Department is directed refund the refund.

Tata Communications Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2019) 183 DTR 26 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate–Alternative remedy – Revision would be futile/academic in nature-Writ is maintainable. [S. 201(1), 201(IA), 264, Art.226]

TLG India (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2019) 184 DTR 345 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services–Tax deducted at source as contractor–Demand is raised for short deduction of tax at source–Order passed without following the principle of natural justice–Order set aside . [S.194C, 201(1), 201(IA)]

TLG India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 184 DTR 331/(2020) 312 CTR 182 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Natural justice-Order passed enhancing the tax liability, without giving an opportunity of hearing is quashed. [S. 80P, 155, 251, Art. 226]

Badagabettu Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. CIT(A) (2019) 184 DTR 313/ (2020)313 CTR 598 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice issued beyond six years from the end of relevant AY.2009-10-Limitation-Reopened based on the subsequent decision of the Appellate Tribunal–The limitation of six years under S. 149, must be alive on the date of passing of the order of CIT(A). In the present case since, as on 05.10.2011, the time limit for reopening of assessment for A.Y. 2009-10 had not lapsed, the order of the ITAT was well within the limitation- Notice of reassessment is valid -Petition is dismissed. [S. 80IC, 148, 150, 254(1), Art.226 ]

Intec Corporation v. ACIT (2019) 184 DTR 425 / (2020) 312 CTR 3 / 424 ITR 167 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–The stay is operating against passing of the final assessment order -Stay the assessment proceedings is dismissed. [S. 143(2), 148, 158BC, Art.226]

Devendra Kumar Singh v. CIT (2019) 184 DTR 281 / (2020) 312 CTR 49/ 269 Taxman 123/425 ITR 222 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Notice under S.143(2) of the Income Tax Act was never issued to the Assessee before initiating of proceedings under Section 158 BC of the Income Tax Act- Order is held to be bad in law. [S. 158BB, 158BC, 260A]

CIT v. Fomento Finance & Investment (P) Ltd. (2019) 183 DTR 340 / (2020) 312 CTR 88 / 421 ITR 146 / 272 Taxman 171(Bom.)(HC)