S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital – Sufficient own funds -Interest cannot be disallowed.
Dy. CIT v. BBF Industries Ltd. (2019)73 ITR 428 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital – Sufficient own funds -Interest cannot be disallowed.
Dy. CIT v. BBF Industries Ltd. (2019)73 ITR 428 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Disallowance cannot be made in absence of exempt income . [ R.8D ]
Dy. CIT v. BBF Industries Ltd. (2019)73 ITR 428 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Object of general public utility – Activity for planned urban development is not hit by proviso to section 2(15)- Entitled to exemption .[ S.2(15) ,12A ]
Bangalore Development Authority v. Dy.CIT( E ) (2019)73 ITR 711 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 10(33) : Capital asset –Tax avoidance- Loss on redemption of units – Short term capital loss is allowed to be set off – Denial of exemption on dividend is held to be not valid. [ S.2(14) , 94(7) ]
Agencies Rajasthan P. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 73 ITR 633/ 179 ITD 90 / 180 DTR 113 (Jaipur) (Trib.)General Sales tax (GST)
Doctrine of promissory estoppel- New Package Scheme of incentives, 1993 – The eligibility for sales-tax exemption cannot be withdrawn under General Sales tax (GST) [ Art. 39(b) 39(c) ]
S. 252 : Appellate Tribunal – Departmental promotion (DPC) – Assistant registrar – The Dept is expected to follow up the proposals to fill up the posts of Assistant Registrars in such quota as well as for issuing promotions for the posts of Deputy Registrars so that all these pots to the extent possible can be filled up at the earliest .
All India Federation of Tax Practitioner (AIFTP) v. UOI (Bom)(HC), www.itatonline.orgS. 153A : Assessment – Search- Even if search happens in case of assessee, the AO cannot initiate proceedings u/s 153A if incriminating material is found during search of other person- Proceedings should be initiated u/s 153C and failure to do so renders the addition in the s. 153A assessment void-ab-initio. [ S.153C ]
Trilok Chand Chaudhary v. ACIT (Delhi)(Trib), www.itatonline.orgS. 148 : Reassessment – Notice- Mere issue of a notice is not sufficient – service of notice is essential – If the postal authorities return the notice unserved, the Dept has to serve under Rule 127(2) using one of the four sources of address (such as PAN address, Bank address etc). The failure to do so renders the reassessment proceedings invalid.[ S. 127, 147, 149, 282 Rule, 127 ]
Harjeet Suraprakash Girotra v. UOI (2019) 266 Taxman 29/ 311 CTR 287/180 DTR 257(Bom)(HC), www.itatonline.orgS. 45: Capital loss- Long term capital gains- Long term capital loss – Set -off is allowed against taxable income .[ S.(2(14) ,2(39A)10 (38 ), 45, 70 , 71,72,74 ]
United Investment v. ACIT (Kol)(Trib), www.itatonline.orgS. 6(6) : Residence in India – Not-ordinarily resident – Cash credits -If the assessee is non –resident amount found deposited in a foreign bank is not taxable in India either u/s 68 or u/s 69 of the Act – Period of 182 days to be considered for calculating residential status of a person migrated to Foreign Country . [ S. 68, 69 ]
PCIT v. Binod Kumar Singh ( 2019) 178 DTR 49 / 264 Taxman 335/ 310 CTR 243 /( 2020) 423 ITR 175 (Bom)(HC),www.itatonline.org