S. 45 : Capital gains-Firm–Retirement-Excess sum paid over and above sum standing to credit of capital account of partner is assessable as capital gains. [S. 2(47), 54EC]
Savitri Kadur v. DCIT (2019) 177 ITD 259/ 181 DTR 255 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 45 : Capital gains-Firm–Retirement-Excess sum paid over and above sum standing to credit of capital account of partner is assessable as capital gains. [S. 2(47), 54EC]
Savitri Kadur v. DCIT (2019) 177 ITD 259/ 181 DTR 255 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 45 : Capital gains–Sale of land-Invested in several small properties-Assessable as capital gains and not as business income. [S. 28(i)]
Munish Singla v. ACIT (2019) 177 ITD 529 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source- Wharfage charges–Not rent–Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 194I]
Angre Port (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 177 ITD 291/ 181 DTR 169 (Pune)(Trib.)S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source- Contractors-Payments to dealers in lieu of service coupons–Liable to deduct tax at source-Payees have filed the return and taken in to account sum for computing income and paid the tax-No disallowance can be made–Matter remanded for verification. [S. 194C, 201(1)]
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 177 ITD 699/ 183 DTR 89 (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source– Failure to deduct tax at source–Not allowable as deduction. [S. 2(28A), 194A, 194J]
ACIT v. Hiravati Marine Products (P.) Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 722 (Rajkot)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Reimbursement of salary paid by sister concern- Held to be allowable as deduction.
Angre Port (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 177 ITD 291/ 181 DTR 169 (Pune)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Enhanced compensation-Matter set aside to examine lease agreement whether the assessee is entitle to recover from sub–lessees.
ACIT v. Rubber Park India (P.) Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 614 (Cochin) (Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue–Acquisition of Set Top Boxes (STB)–Capital expenditure-Depreciation is allowable at 15%.[S. 32].
ACIT v. Kerala Communicators Cable Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 623/ 201 TTJ 704 / 183 DTR 313 (Cochin)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Trade advances–Allowable as deduction. [S. 28(i)]
ACIT v. Hiravati Marine Products (P.) Ltd. (2019) 177 ITD 722 (Rajkot)(Trib.)S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital–Stock in trade– Housing project–Percentage completion method-Interest on money borrowed-Added to cost of project. [S.145, AS 16]
ITO v. Khatu Shyam Builders. (2019) 177 ITD 643 (Jaipur) (Trib.)