S. 244A : Refund – Interest on refunds – Un paid amount of tax the assessee entitle to interest this would not amount to granting interest on interest . [ S.244A(1) (b) ]
Garsim Industries Ltd v .DCIT ( 2021) BCAJ – January -P. 47 ( Mum) (Trib)S. 244A : Refund – Interest on refunds – Un paid amount of tax the assessee entitle to interest this would not amount to granting interest on interest . [ S.244A(1) (b) ]
Garsim Industries Ltd v .DCIT ( 2021) BCAJ – January -P. 47 ( Mum) (Trib)S. 80JJAA : Employment of new workmen – Exemption cannot be denied when the employees fulfilled the condition of being employed for 300 days for the year under consideration , even though such employees do not fulfil the condition of being employed for 300 days in the immediately preceding assessment year .
Tata Elxsi Ltd v. JCIT ( 2021) BCAJ- January – P 46 ( Bang) (Trib)S. 50 : Capital gains – Depreciable assets – Block of assets – Expenditure incurred on account of stamp duty , registration charges and society transfer fee , as per contractual terms is an allowable expenditure [ S.45, 50(1)(i) ]
DCIT v. B.E.Billimoria & Co Ltd ( 2021 ) BCAJ-January -P 48 ( Mum) (Trib)S. 44AD :Presumptive taxation- Once business income is offered on the presumption taxation , separate addition cannot be made as cash credits [ S.68 ]
Dineshkumar Verma v .ITI ( 2021 ) The Chamber’s Journal – January -P 123 ( Mum) (Trib)S. 44AD :Presumptive taxation- Presumptive taxation is not applicable to interest and remuneration received by a partnership firm [ S.28(v), 40(b) ]
AnandKumar v .ACIT ( 2021) The Chamber’s Journal – January -P 113 ( Mad ) (HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Provision made for site restoration is a contingent liability – Allowable as deduction on the principle of commercial expediency .[ S.145 ]
Vedanta Ltd v. JCIT ( 2021 ) BCAJ-January P. 58 ( Mad) (HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Discount in issue of ESOP is an allowable deduction – Contingent liability .[S.4, 143(3) 145, Companies Act , 1956 , S. 2(15A) ]
CIT v. Bicon Ltd ( 2021) The Chamber’s Journal – January – P 115 ( Karn) (HC)Interpretation -Natural Justice – There is a clear distinction between cases where there was no hearing at all and the cases where there was mere technical infringement of the principle
State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh (SC), www.itatonline.orgInterpretation -Natural Justice – There is a clear distinction between cases where there was no hearing at all and the cases where there was mere technical infringement of the principle
State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh (SC), www.itatonline.orgS. 245C : Settlement Commission – Second application – No bar for filing second application [ S. 245D(1), 245K(2), Art , 226 ]
CIT v. Adhiparasakhi Charitable Medical Educational Cultural Trust ( 2020) The Chamber’s Journal – December – P. 167 /Trust (2020) 121 taxmann.com 24/ (2021) 2021] 277 Taxman 333 (Mad) (HC) . ( Mad ) (HC)