This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10(37) : Capital gains – Acquisition of agricultural land- Interest -Interest awarded on enhanced compensation paid by Government for acquisition of agricultural land under S. 28 of Acquisition Act would partake of character of compensation and would be eligible for exemption. [Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S.10(37), 56(2)(vii)]

ITO v. Vinayak Hari Palled (2018) 173 ITD 399 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax–Capital or revenue-Capital gains- Capital asset- Right to sue -Development agreement- Builder-Right to sue is a right in personal which cannot be transferred and, thus, amount received as compensation in lieu of said right is not chargeable to tax. [S. 2(14), 2(47) 28(va), 45]

Bhojison Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 173 ITD 436 / 172 DTR 281/ 196 TTJ 196 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 2(28A) : Interest -Usance interest -Paid to holding company for delayed payment for purchase of goods was not part of purchase price, but interest–Liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India –Singapore, [S. 40(a)(i), 195, Art.7, 11]

ACIT v. Overseas Trading and Shipping Co. (P.) Ltd. (2018) 173 ITD 446 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend- Group companies – Amount received and also paid each other for the purpose of business transactions -No amount has gone to share holder- Addition is held to be not justified.

Saamag Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 173 ITD 350 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 2(15) : Charitable purpose – Medical reliefs- charging nominal fee for providing services exemption cannot be denied , proviso is held to be not applicable [ [S.11, 12AA ]

ITO v. Escorts Cardiac Disease Hospital Society. (2018) 173 ITD 406/( 2019) 197 TTJ 708/ 174 DTR 321 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 2(14)(iii)(b) : Capital asset-Agricultural land- 8KM- Distance from Municipal limits to area in which land is situated is to be considered and not distance between particular land and municipal limit-Matter remanded. [S.45, 54F]

Rakesh Garg v. ITO (2018) 173 ITD 302/( 2019) 197 TTJ 632 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S.45: Capital gains – Business income – Merely holding shares for a short period will not convert capital gain into business income-.This would be contrary to be legislative mandate which itself provides that investment held for less than 12 months is to be termed as short term capital gain-If the assessee has two portfolios, one for “Investment” and other for “Trading” and if the investments are out of own funds and not borrowed funds, the gains have to be assessed as short term capital gains [ S.28 (i)]

CIT v. Viksit Engineering Ltd (2018) 100 taxmann.com 436 (Bom.)(HC) . www.itatonline.org

S. 272A : Penalty – Failure to answer questions – Sign statements – Furnish information -New accountant of assessee ignorant of statutory provisions of tax deduction at source-Reasonable cause- Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 272A(2)(k), 273B]

Investascent Wealth Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 65 ITR 604 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment—So long as the income escaped assessment for which reasons were recorded has been assessed, the Assessing Officer has power to include other incomes which has escaped assessment and which comes to his knowledge in the course of the proceedings under this section. Disallowance of commission is held to be justified. [S. 37(1), 80IB]

Sun Infraa v. DCIT(2018) 65 ITR 687 (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price—Comparables-Providing back office support services-Followed rule of consistency -Different business hence cannot be comparable. [S. 92CA ]

Exxon Mobil Company India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 65 ITR 583 /196 TTJ 1070 / 97 taxmann.com 43 (Mum.)(Trib.)